User talk:Buzzancam1/Evaluate an Article

Response
This is a good start to your evaluation, MB. I like that you're laser-focused on the precise details of each section, and that your questions suggest the need for further sourcing. I wonder how, overall, you'd rate the article? Obviously there is always room for improvement, but considering the content areas you've identified against the writing-based issues (sourcing, tone, style, organization, etc), what do you think of the article in total? Pthomas4 (talk) 15:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)