User talk:Buzzdup-entertainment

paragon 03:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

That name would be OK. But do consider this:

Here are a few key questions:
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

I do not wish to violate principles or Anything.Makka-Negus 23:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I am reverting your last edit, in which you posted a spurious claim that an unblock request had been placed on hold by a nonexistent administrator called "Makka-Negus" while he or she consulted the blocking administrator. Presumably this was some sort of mistake. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Since you have not answered the three questions from Daniel Case in 12 days, I am declining the current unblock request. Please feel free to post a new unblock request, but in doing so you need to make it clear that you do not intend to continue the kind of unambiguously promotional editing which you did before you were blocked. To do so, add the text at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)