User talk:BwBriggs

BwBriggs, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Bridgeton House
If Google Business is not displaying what you think they should then you need to take the matter up with Google. We have no responsibility for what they display. You wouldn't expect an article to be removed from the Encyclopaedia Britannica for this reason so why do you expect it to be removed from here? Phil Bridger (talk) 19:19, 10 April 2020 (UTC) Phil Google is scraping information from the outdated not correct Wikipedia page. This is the page that needs to be removed. It is NOT a Google My Business listing. This page needs to be removed. Bridgeton House is my business. Shouldn't people using the internet be able to find the correct information when searching for "Bridgeton House"? Shouldn't there be good will in the world to allow people to get where they need to go and find full comprehensive information about a place? Shouldn't you help a small business especially given the current COVID-19 situation and the challenges with that alone? Can we do anything legally (trademarks??) to get this removed? Provide ownership paperwork or anything at all? Or no matter what we are completely screwed? You have no idea how much this one little page is hurting us. BwBriggs (talk) 20:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Listen, I get it's frustrating but you're making a mess. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a business directory. If you have problems with google results, contact google but you must cease editing the article as you have a conflict of interest and your edits are just generally unhelpful. Praxidicae (talk) 20:47, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Delete :We created the business Bridgeton House in 1981 in this building. How it got on wikipedia as just a building that happens to be a hotel is the problem. You are using our name & google is capturing it as a search tool for a businesses. The only 'historical' thing about this building is that it was created into a hotel & provides lodging, since 1981. It prevents us from capturing the Hotel page that all hotels are eligible for when searching under their names in google. It includes reviews, rates & links to our website. Like this https://www.google.com/search?channel=cus3&client=firefox-b-1-d&q=bridgeton+house Wiki shows up & our listing does not. We know wiki is not a business directory but it is stopping us from being shown only to highlight a building named bridgeton house that we created. By removing it you you make it accurate for the searcher, searching for Bridgeton ouse the hotel.

What it should be is this https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&channel=cus3&ei=KpzrXvyZJ66EytMPtu6cgAk&q=bridgeton+houseinn&oq=bridgeton+houseinn&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzIECAAQDTIECAAQDTIKCAAQCBANEAoQHjoECAAQRzoGCAAQDRAKUMpxWJJ2YP2FAWgAcAF4AIABaogBlwKSAQMyLjGYAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwj81qb96YvqAhUugnIEHTY3B5AQ4dUDCAs&uact=5. BwBriggs (talk)

June 2020
Your recent editing history at Bridgeton House shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Please go to the talk page and discuss your proposed changes. Primefac (talk) 17:13, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Your edit at WP:Articles for deletion/Bridgeton House
Hi, I think your comment at WP:Articles for deletion/Bridgeton House indicates that you think the article should be deleted. For your view to be properly recorded, would you paste the following wikitext at the start of your comment? Delete Or if I've read your comment incorrectly, you could paste: Keep Thanks! Schazjmd  (talk)  19:13, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! BwBriggs

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hotels in Bucks County, Pennsylvania


A tag has been placed on Category:Hotels in Bucks County, Pennsylvania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:35, 19 June 2020 (UTC)