User talk:Bwilcke~enwiki

Behaupte bitte keinen Schwachsinn auf der Seite von Jimbo: Ich bin seit Ende Februar nicht mehr Vorstandsmitglied des Wikimedia e. V.! Aber derlei schlampige Recherchen bin ich von dir ja gewohnt. --217.9.56.32 14:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC) (Henriette)

Bist Du von selbst zurückgetreten? Oder haben sie auch schon etwas gemerkt? -- Bwilcke 15:35, 16 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Du schreibst ja wohl häufiger an den Wikimedia, aber ich möchte denen weitere Mails von dir ersparen. Wie wärs, wenn du mal auf der Seite des Vereins nachschaust? Ich kann meinen Namen dort nicht entdecken. Und so langsam wäre dann mal eine Entschuldigung für deine ewigen Unverschämtheiten und Unterstellungen angebracht. --217.9.56.49 16:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC) (Henriette)


 * Sag mal, leidest Du jetzt auch schon an Halluzinationen? Mails an Wikimedia? Warum sollte ich? Ich weiß nicht einmal deren e-mail-Adresse. Und wenn sich jemand zu entschuldigen hätte, dann Du und Deine Erfüllungsgehilfen für all die Beleidigungen an meien Adresse und Eure Lügen und richtlinienwidrigen Sperrungen und Euren Mißbrauch von Admin-Rechten, insbesondere auch im Hinblick auf das Verschwindenlassen der VAs. Du bist es, die hier außerordentlich unverschämt ist. Ich finde Euer Verhalten ekelerregend und schockierend. -- Bwilcke 00:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

J. Allen Hynek
Do you have a reason for deleting the quote from this article? It seems to be both relevant and important in context. Just zis Guy you know? 09:10, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello, JzG, thank you for your attention. My reasons' for deleting the paragraph in question: 1) It gives the wrong suggestion that Hynek returned to Project Blue Book's conventional explanations, which is not true, there has to be taken into account the context which I provided for in subsection "UFO origin hypotheses" that shows something very different. 2) Hyneks hypotheses (ETI and/or EDI or M&M) have nothing to do with Project Blue Book, so the paragraph is misplaced there. 3) As far as the paragraph in question could be corroborated by Hynek quotations it had been incorporated by me; I did not really "delete" it. 4) The reader could not verify the source (which now is missing any way), it was undetectable. My sources are solid and verifiable.-- Bwilcke 01:05, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Bwilcke. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Bwilcke~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 22:45, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)