User talk:Bwong365

Galaxy S
It is obvious you are deliberately adding negative information about Galaxy S without giving any indication why it is significant. This is Tendentious editing.(Tendentious editing) There are thousands upon thousands of Apple/HTC/Motorola/Rims problems every single modles, and most of them are not significant. You can't go on a mission to put mention of every problems from fourm, blog, personal opinions sources into all the Galaxy S articles. This thing apply to any other phones (Apple/HTC/Motorola/Rims). I can pick up every single negative informations of iphone/HTC/Motorola/Rims/Sony phones from fourm, blog, personal opinions, some news sources. The policy undue weight explains why. of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 660gd4qo (talk) 10:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

More detail

 * 1) ^  http://mobile.engadget.com/2010/08/02/wheres-the-gps-fix-for-the-samsung-vibrant-and-captivate/
 * 2) ^ a b http://androidforums.com/samsung-captivate/128026-everyone-who-having-gps-problems.html
 * 3) ^ http://androidforums.com/samsung-galaxy-s/104872-gps-issues.html
 * 4) ^ http://androidforums.com/samsung-vibrant/132109-gps-doesnt-work.html
 * 5) ^ a b http://www.anandtech.com/show/3891/samsung-epic-4g-review-the-fastest-android-phone/10
 * 6) ^ http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=728611
 * 7) ^ http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/17/samsung-galaxy-s-gps-gate-two-problems-not-one-and-what-to-do/
 * 8) ^ http://www.androidcentral.com/samsung-announces-captivate-gps-fix
 * 9) ^ http://androidforums.com/samsung-epic-4g/163692-testing-gps-satellite-usage-your-new-epic-right-way-have-use-wireless-networks-off.html
 * 10) ^ http://androidforums.com/epic-4g-support-troubleshooting/179689-gps-cache-problem-workaround-tested-working.html
 * 11) ^ http://androidforums.com/samsung-epic-4g/166945-lousy-down-up-load-speed-3g.html
 * 12) ^ http://blog.laptopmag.com/superphone-face-off-htc-evo-4g-vs-samsung-epic-4g/3
 * 13) ^ http://community.sprint.com/baw/thread/43883
 * 14) ^ http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2010/09/sprint_epic_4g_update_arrives_to_solve_3g_upload_speed_issues.html
 * 15) ^ http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=749470
 * 16) ^ http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=756002
 * 17) ^ http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1524760&p=1
 * 18) ^ http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=764548&page=8
 * 19) ^ http://www.talkandroid.com/14129-verizon-fascinates-long-list-of-issues-gets-leaked/
 * 20) ^ http://www.htlounge.net/art/13430/verizon-makes-google-search-optional-for-samsung-fascinate-using-android-2-2.html
 * 21) ^ http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=793404
 * 22) ^ http://www.facebook.com/samsungmobilecanada?v=wall&filter=1

Identifying reliable sources

"Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason self-published media—whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, personal pages on social networking sites, Internet forum postings, or tweets—are largely not acceptable."

I removed Internet forum postings contents. androidforums.com, forum.xda-developers.com, community.sprint.com, facebook.com, blog.laptopmag.com... etc.
 * Self-published sources (online. eg.Internet forum postings) should not as a source in wikipedia

And your comment
 * "Community a reputable source for "user-reports""

No. Only Academic/Scholary Community are reliable source. See WP:RS. --660gd4qo (talk) 11:34, 27 November 2010 (UTC)