User talk:Bxv93

October 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Roland Rat has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Roland Rat was changed by Bxv93 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962734 on 2013-10-17T04:53:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 05:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Roland Rat has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Roland Rat was changed by Bxv93 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2016-05-25T06:02:19+00:00.

Roland Rat revision
Re your Roland Rat revision, in which you removed the cited comments by Mike Stock about non-involvement in the music: If Pete Waterman has stated he worked on the record it's up to you to include that info and provide a citation, not simply delete cited comments by Stock saying something that you don't agree with. If Stock did meet David, contrary to Stock's claims, you need to provide a citation for that, not simply delete a cited reference stating otherwise. Just FYI, Stock did not claim that the SAW branding on the record was used fraudulently. It was an occasional occurrence that Waterman would do a deal to produce content but SAW themselves wouldn't work on the track, and instead it'd be done by other staffers like Phil Harding or Pete Hammond, using the SAW branding. Hence his comment about it being a branding exercise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CriticalWeightRange (talk • contribs) 22:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)