User talk:Byallmeansdude

Hello, I'm Mike Searson. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Gun politics in the United States because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 18:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Caution
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC) Please be aware that your comments were completely out of line with NPOV policy. If you restore them, you are likely to be blocked from editing without further warning. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Gun politics in the United States. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:54, 16 September 2014 (UTC)