User talk:Bycharlie

Welcome!
Hello, Bycharlie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as LoveHealing, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ruby  Murray  22:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of LoveHealing


A tag has been placed on LoveHealing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ruby  Murray  22:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of That Virginia


Hello. A tag has been placed on That Virginia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Animalparty! (talk) 02:01, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:That-Virginia-bkg.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:That-Virginia-bkg.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your editing
Your first article was pure advertising and totally unsuitable for an encyclopaedia. Your second (That Virginia) was better, but contained wording like "both sweet and raw, controlled and emotional" which is not what an encyclopaedia is about. I would suggest that you read some random articles (there's a button for this near top left) to see how an article should be written. At the moment, I have the feeling that you are working in PR, or are trying to get into PR, or have been reading too many adverts. The last is curable, the first probably not. To have articles, the subjects must be shown to be notable. Being 'about to become successful' is not good enough. Please see WP:BIO for notability for people (and WP:BAND if musicians), and WP:CORP or WP:GROUP for companies or group of people (but not rock groups - they're 'bands'). In all cases, there must be reliable independent sources to prove the notability - please see WP:RS. Peridon (talk) 17:01, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

My editing
Thank you for your contribution, I agree with the deletion of the first article but really hoped I could have some time to edit and bring the deserved credibility to "That Virginia article". I am not and want not to be in PR, just wanted to write an article about a truly great artist that is touching my community and many others. I will not pursue to continue this post for the time being, however, I would appreciate if I can have a copy of the deleted material in case I decide to improve the article later, perhaps later on in the road of fame. Thank you once again for your remarks.

Bycharlie
 * You'll get a better signature if you just type the ~ without anything else. OK. I've restored it and userfied it. (Wikipedia language: moved it into your user space). User space is the safest place to work on things, but I would advise toning down the rather peacocky bits (WP:PEACOCK). In user space, the patrollers can only tag for spam, copyright violation, attack and hoax. I've removed the tags and the categories, as they are currently irrelevant (and in the case of categories, not allowed in user space. A word o friendly warning: writing about a subject you are enthusiastic about can cause problems. Enthusiasm isn't allowed in articles, and if your idol has feet of clay, you can't stop someone (with proper references) pointing them out. Wikipedia is warts and all. I'm not userfying the first article - it would be tagged again in minutes. The fact of userfying should hold the more experienced patrollers off the second one until you can remove the tail feathers. Copy it from an edit window into a notepad file to be sure. If there's a problem, I can always dig it up again. BTW I know and have played with quite a few great performers who haven't got articles. Talent isn't all that's needed. There's luck, and sometimes the ones without the talent get that. Oh, yes, better tell you where it is: User:Bycharlie/draft copy of That Virginia To create user space things to work on, just type that (with a different title) somewhere, click Preview, click the new redlink and save the new page. Or you can put the link on your user page and save it. Then clicking the redlink creates the new page, and you can save it and find it again easily from your user page. Peridon (talk) 22:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)