User talk:C+C

Revert
You just reverted Insulator (electrical). I would say that that was a good faith edit. Fahadsadah (talk) 17:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I do not understand what you mean. The person replaced the entire article with a single sentence. Two minutes previously, he also replaced it with "An insulator, also called a loser, is a material that has feelings ♥♥♥ Aww so sweet and im a hacker btw ppl >:D[." --C+C (talk) 17:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Nice work
Just like to give you a thumbs up and thank you for your work fighting vandalism here. Keep it up! :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 18:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks!--C+C (talk) 18:59, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Concering the word penis
Just because an edit uses the word penis does not mean it is vandalism. I am trying to fix a fallacy of information on the Last Judgment by Michelangelo that comes from mistaken assumptions stemming from its pre-restored state. When a certain penis was painted over and changed the orginial intentions (and offensivness) of the work.

Hay
Hay why do you guys keep sending me warnings I don't need them I undid the edits so why do you all still think there bad. Thy aren't hurting Wikipedia so their is no problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nulledit (talk • contribs) 19:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Userpage
Why don't you have a userpage, ? Valerian456 Hush,  Rush 09:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Thrilla in Manila
You got a bit carried away with your reversion of Thrilla in Manila - the portion you thought was removed was moved to a more appropriate place. Also, the Citations and NPOV boxes were properly added, and if you cared to participate in the Talk section of articles you edit, were agreed by multiple editors.

Nothing was removed from the article.

Please read thoroughly, including the relevant Talk page, before insta-reverting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.58.2 (talk) 19:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, it may have been a bug in Huggle. If so, no sweat. 98.232.58.2 (talk) 19:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Apology
I apologize if I reverted you by mistake on Frank Zappa, as I thought I was reverting User talk:204.39.36.130. So if I did revert you, I am very sorry. Regards, &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 19:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Blocked
Yamla (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)