User talk:Cárdenas1868

May 2024
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Juan de Oñate have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Juan de Oñate was changed by Cárdenas1868 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956732 on 2024-05-10T00:49:46+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Juan de Oñate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adam Black talk &bull; contributions 00:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I totally disagree with the way some of Juan de Oñate's text has been criticised, I am a historian and some of the details in the text were not correct. The part of the massacre of 1599 is a subject that was subject to over-dimensions and with many shadows due to the absence of physical evidence. Cárdenas1868 (talk) 13:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I have replied in full to your concerns at the post on my talk page. Adam Black talk &bull; contributions 21:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

'Vandalism'
Here, you used the phrase "the vandalism of those who write without being absolutely certain about it".

It is very important that you understand what is vandalism, and what is not.

Vandalism is characterized by malice - or, at best, frivolity. The vandal's mindset is "ha ha, look what I did!"

If someone's edit was well-intentioned - even if they were not absolutely certain of their facts - then it was not vandalism, and calling it that can lead to animosity. DS (talk) 22:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)