User talk:Cæsey

I will not be attempting a standard offer unblock. I am not a good fit for this encyclopedia, and have caused more harm than good. My other accounts are:

Xenrose (Not currently blocked)

Hartconan (blocked)

1984 Cadillac (blocked)

Dryercotes (blocked)

Rufus Rose (blocked)

Stephen Cali (blocked)

Thank you.

Please block these accounts and possibly lock them.

Cleanstart is clearly not applicable here.

Sincerely, Caesey

MascotGuy
Special:Log/Spectrum Guy. Please consider using a consultation method. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:16, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Oh. I must have missed that one. Thanks, If you have not already done it, i will just go unarchive that. Cæsey (Light•Dark) 07:19, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, yes unarchiving is something I could have done myself. The other part's the important bit. Have I had this conversation with you before? -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:23, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No., but you have talked with me before. Cæsey (Light•Dark) 07:25, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Purpose of Wikipedia
Your account was created on 10 April 2018 and your total number of edits is under 520. On 12 April 2018 Primefac deleted a section from WP:ANI with edit summary "DENY": diff. Before deletion, the section was permalink.

Primefac also blocked your account. Vanjagenije accepted an unblock request with an edit summary that included "see the talk page". At that time, the talk page was permalink and included your reply to zzuuzz which requested an unblock with conditions that included (diff):
 * I do not edit user pages except my own EXCEPT...
 * I do not edit long-term abuse EXCEPT...
 * I do not tag socks etc.

Special:Contributions/Cæsey shows an upsurge of activity including a very unhealthy interest in LTA and sock pages. Examples:
 * Fiddling on a user page of someone indeffed in 2007.
 * Busy-work on talk of an indeffed user who last edited in 2012.
 * Tweaking LTA pages.

The purpose of Wikipedia is to develop an encyclopedia. That does not involve returned users with a fascination for socks and LTAs. Johnuniq (talk) 07:46, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

LTA lists
Can you please explain your series of edits Long-term abuse/List here? CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:46, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * , it appears they have retired. Primefac (talk) 17:53, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2018 (UTC) I know they said they are retired, but that isn’t binding and this is. This user seems only interested in screwing around and making messes others have to clean up. Why they do this is unimportant, the fact that they do it is enough to warrant a block to prevent further disruption. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Unblock

 * You made promises last time you were blocked, and broke them almost immediately. You said you quit and put up a “retired banner yesterday and today you’re back again. Makes it hard to believe any promises you may make. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I would have blocked you myself if you hadn't put up the "retired" template. I would like to hear your response to Beeblebrox, but as it stands my feelings currently are quite in line with theirs, mostly because you've now gone back on your stated actions twice in as many days. Primefac (talk) 01:04, 29 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Also, : my decline stands on it's own regardless of this, but is there any chance that this is : their unblock request is quite similar in style and to an extent follows the suggestions that laid out. They share the obnoxious userpages and interest in messing about with things beyond their capacity to edit. This account was also created the same day UpsandDowns1234 withdrew their rename request on meta. UpsandDowns1234 also apparently has a newfound interest in abuse filters, like our newfound LTA hunter here, and, miraculously, was blocked on their main account ~8-9 months ago, which is how long Cæsey claims to have been reading the manual. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:24, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No, I don't think so, quite unlikely (usual disclaimers apply). -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:33, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Unblock
OK. Cæsey (Light•Dark) 18:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC)