User talk:Cæsey/Archive 1

Speedy deletion nomination of Test page creation out


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Test page creation out, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Septrillion (talk) 06:05, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, please delete it as it was just a test page. Cæsey Shine! 06:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Please don't test in mainspace! It creates extra work for the admins! Septrillion (talk) 06:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the advice, I will not do that again, sorry. Cæsey  Shine! 06:11, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The activity on this account is very suspicious! Have you operated any accounts prior to this one? Septrillion (talk) 06:16, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

No, but I have been reading up on the administrative section of wikipedia for around eight months now, and I have never edited. if you are suspicious of me, that's natural. Thanks for your concern. Sincerely, Cæsey  Shine! 06:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

(I do not know all the policies yet, but I will take time to read through them. I have quite a decent knowledge of the sockpuppetry policy, though. Sincerely, Cæsey  Shine! 06:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Previous account.
Please can you state your real accounts and connect it to your new userpage? –Ammarpad (talk) 07:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but I do not understand your question. if you are asking if I have had past accounts, i have already answered that above. Cæsey Shine! 07:54, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * That's implausible explanation. Don't fool yourself. –Ammarpad (talk) 08:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

It's okay if you don't believe me, i am only here to contribute well to the encyclopedia. Sincerely, Cæsey  Shine! 19:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

100th edit
Yes!! Cæsey Shine! 21:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

A thank you
For reverting User:2600:100D:B120:5EC5:69FD:E49:8CFC:8039 on their talk page. I was going to revert it, but I wasn't sure whether or not it would be in violate of WP:3RR. Rock on. UnsungKing123 (talk) 22:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. Cæsey Shine! 22:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Users and IPs are allowed to blank or remove warnings and messages off their own talk pages. Aside from this fact, you definitely want avoid getting into an edit war or a back-and-fourth heated dispute like that on user talk pages (or anywhere for that matter). If an editor or user is being disruptive or attempting to troll pages and discussions, doing what you did just now will only feed and pleasure their motives with attention. You have to understand that trolls want to have disputes and heated wars like that happen, they want you to take your time and attention away from other matters and give it to them, and they want to see you arguing with them, reacting defensively, or standing up on a soapbox at them... don't feed the trolls. And in cases where the user may actually be upset and feeling ganged up on... doing what you did will only make the situation 100X worse and will destroy any chance of us trying to resolve their issues and keep them as editors here. I just wanted to leave you a message and, well... let you know that it's okay that users do this (lol), but also to explain why it's really important that we avoid giving users that kind of attention, or even partially that kind of attention ;-). I hope my message was somewhat helpful to you... have a great day and happy editing :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you oshwah i have read the message, and i will not do that again.. Cæsey Shine! 23:11, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

UnsungKing123
In light of some of the other comments on this talk page, perhaps the account above account might be of interest.

Excuse me, but are you implying that I am a sock of Unsungking? Cæsey Shine! 23:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I believe you are the one implying it. I simply put the name of the account out there, nothing more.

I have never used an account prior to this one. Cæsey Shine! 23:05, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

About your account
Hi. As your talk page access has been restored, your new account will remain indefinitely blocked so please make your case here. Would you mind to explain why your editing pattern overlaps rather significantly with a globally locked user account, and also to explain why you are particularly interested in certain long-term abuse cases? Neither of these are anywhere close to being ordinary for a new user, so if you have a previous account, please disclose. Although this is a standard block, if you have reasons that are unsuitable for public discussion, feel free to follow the instructions at Arbitration Committee/Ban appeals to make your case privately. Alex Shih (talk) 14:17, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Unblock

 * As the blocking administrator, I did this mostly on the behavioural evidence but as far as the CUs are concerned they're not directly connected to the alleged master. I received an email (prompting me to restore TPA) that jives with this request, but between that and the original reasons for blocking I feel it would be better to let an uninvolved admin take a look at the case. Primefac (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * What is that behavioural evidence?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:28, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Joins, then immediately asks for Confirmed after finding they can't edit LTA pages. Edits a bunch of the same topics as a blocked sock, and otherwise edits like a sock "being helpful" and evading scrutiny. Primefac (talk) 14:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Can you provide some diffs? I can't see any conclusive link between this account and Iniced. In the SPI, it was claimed by   that there is "pretty significant overlap with past socks", but no diffs were provided.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  16:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Working on a response with diffs, might be a few hours as I'll have to do it on lunch break. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:40, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Excuse me, but the behavioral evidence provided (That I could see) for connecting me with iniced was me adding categories to tom and jerry pages that iniced socks added/removed trivia from. Sincerely, Cæsey  Shine! 03:55, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * From the CU there is absolutely no relationship to Iniced. The behaviour is also well off. Those things both seem clear to me. But the problem as I see it is that other things look a bit dodgy, Cæsey, including your explanations in your talk archive. What do you know of Wikinger, Nipponese Dog Calvero, and Random-5000 in your first day of editing? That's an astonishing thing to study before editing and to focus on when beginning. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I have been reading wp for around 8 months, and i heard of them round 7 months ago. my behavior does look pretty suspicious, doesn't it, but i just am strangely interested in sockpuppets, etc..  Cæsey  Shine! 02:48, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to lean towards overruling Primefac despite being sure this is not Iniced, and I will leave the unblock request for another admin and bid you good day. But I will provide a pro-tip: No serious contributor is as interested in sockpuppets and banned users as you are, and no one likes their hard work of ignoring them being undone. If you want to volunteer for a total self-imposed ban on the subject this might improve your appearance. -- zzuuzz (talk) 05:59, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Helio Koa'eloa
Hello Cæsey, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Helio Koa'eloa, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Appears to be significant in spreading a religion to a geographic region. Talk also makes claims of a cause for cannoninzation, which is certainly a claim to significance .''' You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Cæsey (Talk•Email) 05:02, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Langauge of mrocco
Why you back my edit of article mrocco, I'm from morocco, english us a langauge very used in from general   anwar    call me  23:56, 24 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I reverted it because it removed french, which was sourced. You can probably add in english, but keep french, and discuss on the talk page.  Cæsey (Talk•Email) 23:58, 24 April 2018 (UTC)