User talk:C-squared

*plink*

Restorationism
Hi. Would you support removing the copyedit notice from the Restorationism article, now? Quite a bit of work has been done on it since the notice was posted. Mkmcconn (Talk) 03:20, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * It's a lot better. Completely different article now. I went ahead and removed the notice. --C-squared 12:05, July 24, 2005 (UTC)

Aquinas Institute of Theology
Hi I have tagged this image Image:AI DOMINIC.jpg as nosource if you can locate the source and add a copyright tag thanks Arnie587 22:24, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Done. --C-squared 00:17, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Article Improvement Drive
Wackymacs 07:09, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Religious Pluralism - Article Improvement Drive
Hi C-Squared, I wanted to inform you that we have worked out a new outline for Religious_pluralism, which you support for the Article Improvement; you are invited to take a look at that new structure, propose changes and participate in implementing it. Your expert knowledge on religion would be most welcome. --Robin.rueth 13:33, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

The Black Pope
I was just coasting through Talk:Society of Jesus and noticed you wondered "what specifically in the article has anything to do with a "black pope"?""the Black Pope" is a nickname for the head of the Jesuit order who is supposed to be the one really in charge of the Catholic Church (see various nutters such as Jack Chick ad nauseam). Judging by your use of the indefinite article and lower case letters you seem to have understood it as referring to a Pope from Africa. It doesn't. The Jesuits never really had a habit. Generally however they wore black and were nicknamed "the Blacks". Hence the Black Pope is the head of those dastardly intriguers the Jesuits. That's all. Thought you might like to know. Stroika 16:43, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Please help on William Shakespeare
Posted by PruneauT 01:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID maintenance team.

You helped choose this week's WP:AID winner
- Davodd 05:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Please help on Astronomy
Posted by &rarr; Lzy Genius 11:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID maintenance team.

You helped choose this week's WP:AID winner
Draicone (talk) 12:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

You helped choose as this week's WP:AID winner
Green caterpillar 00:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

You helped choose Mark Twain as this week's WP:AID winner
→ A z a  Toth 00:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

You helped choose Environmentalism as this week's WP:AID winner
AzaBot 18:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

You helped choose Islam as this week's WP:AID winner
Dev920 13:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

You helped choose Rosetta Stone as this week's WP:AID winner
AzaBot 16:19, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sf2k screenshot.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sf2k screenshot.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Sf2k frontpage.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sf2k frontpage.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)