User talk:C. W. Gilmore/Archives/2017/November

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jefferson Davis Park, Washington has been accepted
 Jefferson Davis Park, Washington, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Nihlus 21:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Jefferson_Davis_Park,_Washington help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.
 * I was going to congratulate you on your first article, but I already see an AfD notice below. Ugh. This has happened to me too; see for example this protracted discussion on a war-romancing publisher: Articles for deletion/J.J. Fedorowicz Publishing. The discussion is leaning towards a “keep”, so I hope you don’t feel discouraged. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Ya, as I said, Anmccaff has more in store for me; this is just the beginning. On the plus side, I'm learning about all the different disciplinary boards on Wiki.  I had no idea there was even a thing called, 'meat-puppets' before Anmccaff start on this path.  Thanks again for your help with the article and everything else. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

You are now subject to an interaction ban
Per the ANI discussion: "and are hereby banned from interacting with each other. This includes, stalking, getting in conflicts on the pages they edit, warring over the content, editing each other's userspace, or mentioning the other user.  It is not considered a violation if the other party is being correctly reported for violating the interaction ban or other valid sanctions. It is recommended both parties permanently step away from any article's they have both edited recently." — CYBERPOWER  ( Chat ) 19:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)


 * "...explicit clarification on your IBAN that both of you are not to respond at all to discussions started by the other."


 * Thanks as I have been waiting for this for a month, thanks again. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 19:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)