User talk:C. W. Gilmore/Archives/2018/February

Reliable sources
Hi there

What makes you think I have an issue with reliable sources? I think you will find that I want sources to be quoted accurately but I certainly believe in the concept of Wikipedia being built on reliable sources. Cheers Birtig (talk) 00:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * We can start here User:Birtig. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 04:34, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

ani
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Slatersteven (talk) 21:03, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks Slatersteven, but I was going no where near that AN/I discussion. It has been less than a month since I was last dragged in front of the AN/I for charges.  I have AN/I on my watchlist and 'power~enwiki' already brought up my name.  On the '3%ers', I made a mistake as it was only 28days and reverted it, apologies as I don't want to break the rules.  All of this is a lot to take in before I've had my morning coffee.  C. W. Gilmore (talk) 01:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Vancouver
Glad you’ll help. The problem is that the section on "Blaine and Vancouver" and that on "Vancouver" were written by two different people, and they need to be harmonized into one. How much of what is said about the Vancouver marker also applies to the Blaine marker? Probably Blaine needs its own entry. deisenbe (talk) 14:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Got it deisenbe, they do each have a separate history that only overlaps when they are both moved to that Jefferson Davis Park, about 2yrs apart. I will try to rework them both into separate entries, thanks. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 14:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The second one was on Monument and memorial controversies in the United States (a page I created, BTW). It didn't belong there and I've added a hatnote so hopefully it won't happen again.

Just found a third one and moved that to Removal. deisenbe (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * deisenbe, that last one needs to stay. The Jefferson Davis Park, Washington still exists and has been continually vandalised starting in 2008, 6mos after the park opened.  C. W. Gilmore (talk) 15:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * See List of Confederate monuments and memorials. Since it's still in existence, that's where the main entry for the park should be.


 * Please check Jefferson Davis Highway, where there are two separate (duplicative) mentions of the Blaine and Vancouver markers.


 * FYI, there's an ongoing problem with some removed monuments being put in List (as removed) and some in Removed. The two don't coincide. There isn't a consensus about how to handle it. See Talk:List of Confederate monuments and memorials/Archive 11. deisenbe (talk) 15:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * deisenbe, the Jeff Davis Park was in the Monument and memorial controversies in the United States because it has been repeatedly attacked since it opened in 2008. The Blaine and Vancouver stones are listed in Removal of Confederate monuments and memorials because they got pulled from public lands and put on the Jefferson Davis Park, Washington which it's self is in the List of Confederate monuments and memorials because it still exists.  I hope you will put Jeff Davis Park back into the 'monument controversy' article in some form.  Thanks, and I will look through the Jeff Davis Hwy article to make sure it makes sense as well. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 15:51, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The Controversies article is more recent than List and Removal. It was specifically set up for non-Confederate controversies. There are plenty of Confederate memorials that are controversial. If you open Controversies up it will be even more confusing and contradictory than it is now. There were three things about Jeff Davis, I've taken out two and am going to work soon on the most complex one. deisenbe (talk) 22:03, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * I leave it in your capable hands, let me know if there are any Washington State issues that I my help with and thanks again, deisenbe. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 00:57, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Please have a look at Washington State Route 99 and see if any changes are need regarding this topic. I think the map is wrong. deisenbe (talk) 12:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * deisenbe, that is all that is currently left of State Route 99 that once ran from Blaine to Vancouver Washington. The rest of it has been taken up by Interstate 5 and local Road systems.  "Old HWY 99" is defunct for all intensive purposes except for that small strip that is in the map today. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 12:32, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you could clarify that in the article it would be helpful. This also makes no sense to me, as the 99 article stands: "In 1998, officials of the city of Vancouver, Washington, removed a marker of the [former?] Jefferson Davis Highway [formerly?] Washington State Route 99)". deisenbe (talk) 12:43, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I got Jefferson Davis Highway squared away and beginning to work on Jeff Davis Park. This is slow with poor internet, but working on it.  C. W. Gilmore (talk) 15:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * deisenbe, let me know if they make work now or what problems there are, please; I just finished Jefferson Davis Park, Washington. Thanks C. W. Gilmore (talk) 15:42, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * "In 1998, officials of the city of Vancouver removed a marker of the [former?] Jefferson Davis Highway." (From Jefferson Davis Highway.) Was the marker in 1998 beside a road, and if so, which? deisenbe (talk) 16:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure "former" is appropriate as Hwy 99 never was officially listed as Jeff Davis Hwy, in Washington State anyway; and the 'street' would have been Main Street which turns into NE Hwy 99 just after Interstate 5, but none of the sources say it exactly so I chose to leave it out than make a mistake by presuming something not in the sources. I wanted to be as accurate to the sources as possible and not fill in the gaps with original work.  I hope that's Okay?  C. W. Gilmore (talk) 16:38, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


 * -I have not forgotten the two articles you wished me to update, just rubbish internet currently and fighting with it means less time to edit. Will be working on them soon, thanks C. W. Gilmore (talk) 02:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)