User talk:C. lorenz

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Complexity Class
Template:Infobox Complexity Class has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 22:55, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steiner tree problem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Theoretical Computer Science (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Set splitting problem, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Springer, Coloring and ACM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

About article Sinophobia
"No rationale." "Please motivate in talk." Your way of talking completely sounds like you want to have a 'edit war' with me.

1. There is no such article as "Anti-Mongol sentiment" in the English Wikipedia, and there is no need for it to be there.

2. Why do you believe the article Anti-Japanese Sentiment should be deleted alone, despite other xenophobic articles already being included?

PS: Don't know why you are still forcing your personal feelings, but I don't even think this is debatable at all. Juniv0862 (talk) 23:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I explained the reason for the undoing and since you are making edits removing content without describing the purpose, here we are.
 * Anti-Mongolianism exists - it is probably just a case of renaming. I updated it to the working article.
 * What is the reasoning for listing Anti-Japanese sentiment under See Also? It also already too long of a list and it seems like a rather Westernized perspective to include it merely on the basis of being in Asia. Japan is also at the top of negative Chinese sentiment.
 * C. lorenz (talk) 00:12, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

1. "I explained the reason for the undoing and since you are making edits removing content without describing the purpose."

>>>No, you never explained the real ‘reason’ for your reversion. You’re still insulting me and that's not constructive.

2. "It seems like a rather Westernized perspective to include it merely on the basis of being in Asia."

>>>Totally Nonsense. According to your logic, then why are other articles about other Asian countries still written? You made me ask the same question twice.

Most of all, you can’t edit the articles based on "It seems like" so that means nothing at all. Juniv0862 (talk) 00:57, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * What insults? If someone undos your revisions that have no summaries - especially ones that delete content - then I would propose your redos contain a message describing their reasoning. Anyhow, this is the way to work out a disagreement.


 * I don't understand your question. Of course different articles can be written about sentiments against different nations. It does not mean they should all be linked together - is that what you are proposing? The lists would be very long in that case.


 * The See-Also is already too long. What is your reasoning for the importance? Is there any logic beyond that you want to add a reference to every Asian nation?


 * --C. lorenz (talk) 17:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)