User talk:C.e.street

Welcome!

 * }

Editing on articles related to your publications
I'm sorry to greet you this way, but I'd appreciate it if you'd read Conflict of interest. In addition, we rarely use self-published books as references. References need to meet the criteria at WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. I've reverted your edit, partially because it appears promotional but also because you are making claims about what is the most famous ley line without saying who makes this claim - it needs referencing in any case using an inline citation similar to the other references, but you'd probably also need to say who makes the claim unless you have a reliable source indicating how 'most famous' was determined and that is unlikely to be challenged. I'm sure this is disappointing but Wikipedia is rather more complex than new users usually imagine. Dougweller (talk) 13:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:C.e.street


A tag has been placed on User:C.e.street, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 15:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia user pages are not like those on Myspace or Facebook: they are intended only for the volunteers, who are here to help build the encyclopedia, to say something about themselves, if they choose, to assist communication within the project. They are not for "substantial content... that is unrelated to Wikipedia", and certainly not for advertising or promotion of any kind. Writing an encyclopedia article about oneself is also strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 16:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)