User talk:C6541/Archives/Archive1

Drug Policy
Thanks for coming onboard the Wikiproject Drug Policy. If you're looking for something to do, a bunch of articles have been flagged/tagged but haven't been added to the project page yet. I'm not sure what you plan on editing/adding, but look forward to your participation. Regards, Shamanchill (talk) 13:01, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Edit Summary
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Slashme (talk) 13:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons
Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is, however, another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading your media there instead. That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--OsamaK 06:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dextrorphan 3d.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Dextrorphan 3d.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 19:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Drug binge
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Drug binge, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Optigan13 (talk) 23:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Edit summary
I see you're still not using edit summaries. It really is strongly recommended, you know. It also makes my watchlist easier to read... --Slashme (talk) 10:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

About your recent edit-summary
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. DMacks (talk) 15:09, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Plyhmrp 1
Dont tell me what to do C6541. Plyhmrp (talk)Plyhmrp —Preceding undated comment was added at 01:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Plyhmrp 2
Quit attacking Christians there is evidence on this talk page. You harass me cause im not a atheist. Plyhmrp (talk) Plyhmrp Preceding undated comment was added at 17:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Plyhmrp 3
The evidence is on the first section of your talk. Back the hell off! Plyhmrp (talk)Plyhmrp —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:40, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Propylhexedrine
Of course you ingest SALTS of hydrochloric acid. Example: Table salt, being the sodium salt of hydrochloric acid, sodium chloride. Of course you ingest salt of sulphuric acid, example bitter salt, being magnesium sulphate, when you can't shit. Don't contribute to any chemical discussion until you have taken a basic level chemistry class *you twat* (thats what you said in your edit summary) Are all Americans high school dropout plantation workers? Get a goddam GED. That you have learned a monkey language like C++ or Java doesn't mean you automatically have a judgement over chemical science facts. Get a goddam evening course in basic chemistry and science. Unbelievable these computer monkeys. 70.137.130.176 (talk), 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Methamphetamine
Hi; I think most of your changes have improved the article, but I don't agree with the changes you made to the lead. Simply saying "methamphetamine has the potential to lead to addiction" is too weak. The evidence shows that there are two classes of drugs that are extremely addictive: psychomotor stimulants such as cocaine and amphetamine, and opiates such as morphine or heroin. Of these, the psychomotor stimulants are actually more dangerous, because there is less tendency for the addiction to stabilize at a "maintenance" level. Lots of drugs are addictive to some degree. It is important to point out to our broad readership that methamphetamine stands out from the crowd. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 21:23, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Recipes
Talk pages are for talking about how to improve articles, and putting recipes for illegal drugs in them, especially ones that involve poisonous substances, creates obvious liability concerns. Don't try a stunt like that again, please. looie496 (talk) 00:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Protection of Methamphetamine
I have reprotected this page as per your request at WP:RFPP, but while reviewing it I noticed this edit summary. I know that vandals can be frustrating, but please try to remain civil and refrain from namecalling. Oren0 (talk) 01:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Re propylhexedrine
Calm down already... I removed my rant from your page, stop ranting on my page. Sincerely and truly yours, C6541 (T↔C)  at 12:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Unsigned comment regarding dextromethorphan
This is a known side effect of abusing the drug and I think it's important for people to know the risk, especially kids who think it would be safe and harmless to try. i can add my source but i don't know how. where can i find out how to post this information correctly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikilivia (talk • contribs) 23:29, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Your username
Just curious, what does C6541 refer to? Some chemical I'm guessing? -- &oelig; &trade; 21:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

[No title given by Cenci Bell]
Unfortunately, there is a difference between "striving for having everything verifiable" and claiming a citation is an "exceptional claim." Wikipedia is very clear: red flags are reserved only for "exceptional claims." As you flag randomly, it appears you have no reverence for basic Wikipedia standards. "Exceptional," not ordinary, claims require "exceptional sources." Unless the point is "contentious," or the language is clearly biased, a red flag is inappropriate, if not irresponsible.

If you wish to cite something beyond what others already have, you are welcome to do so— but please only flag items simply because they lack a citation. At any rate, the point of Wikipedia is not to do little more than paraphrase everyone else, so this whole point is ridiculous and juvenile. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cenci Bell (talk • contribs) 13:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC) Cenci Bell (talk) 13:17, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

the template is not the policy manual. read it someday.

it explains what is required to flag, and what isn't. very plainly.

alternatively, lowering the Desoxyn dose might help you not care to begin with...Cenci Bell (talk) 21:41, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

if you don't respect Wikipedia guidelines for flagging, I am entitled to enforce it by removing your irreverence for those guidelines. If you're too lazy to read 4 lines in a policy manual, I suggest not going out of your way on areas you clearly don't care about.

If you are so interested in having a Geurilla-style discipline to your editing, good luck getting more rank as an editor— I will point it out if you ever are reviewed for a higher class. This has nothing to do with the topic. It's about you reducing Wikipedia to a 6th grade book report, paraphrased from some other encyclopedia. That's not what we do here.

the 4 lines you haven't read yet are here:

VerifiabilityCenci Bell (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Cannabis
Welcome! Be sure to read the project page, the corresponding talk page, and subpages (collaboration, assessment, etc.) to learn more about the project and how it operates. I always recommend adding the project page as well as the collaboration page to your watchlist so that you can remain up to date with what is going on. I look forward to seeing your contributions! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

MDMA: Hallucinogen / Stimulant
Hello there. Regarding the drug use template, I think MDMA can be far more readily classified as a stimulant than as a hallucinogen. Sure it's both.. as well as entactogen, but its psychedelic effects are by far the least prominent of the three properties. MDMA really barely even qualifies as a psychedelic.. it just produces color enhancement and perhaps very, very mild mental imagery at standard doses. Its stimulant properties on the other hand are quite prominent. I don't know if you've ever done MDMA or not, but I can assure you from personal experience, its psychedelia is negligible at best..

So, I'm going to move it back to the stimulants template. Hallucinogen is just not suitable..

El3ctr0nika (talk) 15:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Whatever.. bite me over the technicalities.




 * El3ctr0nika (talk) 17:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I was pointing out the fact that despite the word 'hallucinogen' classically/literally meaning "to generate hallucinations", it has long since eclipsed that definition in common usage.


 * El3ctr0nika (talk) 17:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh sure me too, I mean in a psychedelic way if that's what you were saying. I combined phenelzine (Nardil) an MAOI with it one time.. not smart but I was fine for the most part. I was on some weed and K too and well, let's just say I think I tripped the hardest I ever have that night. The MDMA definitely played a major role in it. It was powerfully psychedelic. Regardless, though, at normal doses / without mixing MDMA's psychedelic effects are generally pretty dormant.


 * El3ctr0nika (talk) 19:05, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Busboy_Productions-logo_trans.png
Thank you for uploading File:Busboy_Productions-logo_trans.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:17, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

DV
Yes, I am from the DV. Jersey emt (talk) 03:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Lancet plot
If you got a user name and pass and you signed up you can view the actual data used for the infamous plot graph that is everywhere. It's very detailed.

Here is the link of all the drugs and each's "Acute" "chronic" "IV" and "Mean" rankings: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607604644/table?tableid=tbl3&tableidtype=table_id&sectionType=green

Correction: login not required. And those are decimal points even though it looks like it's in the middle. (0 - 3.0)

Here is the full article after login: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(07)60464-4/fulltext?_eventId=login Tdinatale (talk) 23:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

FQ talk page
Wasn't vandalism, just was non-indented discussion/haranguing. Protonk (talk) 06:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Whoops! Nevermind. I noticed you reverted yourself.  For some reason I read my watchlist as FQ unduing your edit.  My apologies. Protonk (talk) 07:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Don't complain so much, kid.
Seriously, stop complaining about the trivial so much. you are not doing your image any favors, kid. JohnHistory (talk) 08:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)JohnHistory


 * Please go back and refactor this, remembering WP:CIVIL William M. Connolley (talk) 10:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, C, my suggestion is to completely ignore JohnHistory. You're being trolled, and the best approach with people like that is not to feed them.  Regards, Looie496 (talk) 15:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

You redirected Desoxyn to the wrong compound.
Desoxyn is methamphetamine hydrochloride, not dextromethamphetamine. 

Please get your facts straight. The information which has been pasted into the Desoxyn article is the drug information approved by the US FDA. The molecule diagram in that publication (linked above) bears absolutely no resemblance to the diagram linked in dextroamphetamine.

Aerowolf (talk) 04:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:39, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
The appreciation makes it all worthwhile :-) el3ctr0nika (Talk | Contribs) 11:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

AWB
Sure, I've added you to the approved list. A lot of your article contributions seems to be vandalism reverting, but there's enough gnoming and what not in there to justify AWB. Sorry you got skipped, I was just having a look at the most recent request, since that's what showed up in my watchlist. Best, - Kingpin13 (talk) 06:43, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Removal of template
Is there any reason you removed the template from here O-2482. -- Pontificalibus (talk) 09:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries, just thought it might be deprecated or something. -- Pontificalibus (talk) 10:10, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Removed speedy from Shaun_the_Sheep_(video_game)
Hi C6541. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete Shaun_the_Sheep_(video_game), a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion A7 because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to software. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. Regards Kingpin13 (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Foreign-language contributions
Hi. is only used in the situation (not common in my experience) where an article from a foreign WP has been cut-and-pasted here (the point being that to do that loses the contribution record - there is a procedure at WP:TRANSLATE for doing it properly). The foreign WP reference should be included in the tag, e.g..

Much more usually, what we get is a foreign text input by somebody who probably doesn't know any other WP exists. The right tag then is notenglish, which is not a speedy request - because sometimes these articles are worth translating. When that expands on the article page, it gives you a message and a link to the place to paste it on WP:PNT, where someone who knows the language may pick it up and translate or PROD or whatever is appropriate.

If you know or can guess the language, then put, e.g.,. That gives a more useful template, including a link to the relevant foreign Wikipedia, and also a link to Google Translate, which will show you a machine translation - rough and ready, but often good enough (as with Clauisabel magdaleno just now) to tell you that the article is about a NN band or person and can be speedy tagged without bothering to list it at PNT.

The Google Translate facility can be used to help guess the language - e.g. if it looks like Arabic but the translation makes no sense, try Farsi.

There is a useful set of message templates such as contrib-ru1 to give the author a bilingual message saying we require English and pointing him to the foreign WP. List of them at WP:PNT/T. The most exotic one I have yet used for real is contrib-sq1.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

AWB orphan tagging
Just wanted to drop you a note and let you know that I've removed the orphan templates you added to KDIS and WLGC. Both of these pages are disambiguation pages, which means that the fewer incoming links to them, the better. In a perfect world, all disambiguation pages would be orphans. Not sure if there's something wrong in the AWB settings or if it's just a matter of getting more practice with the tool, but I just wanted to let you know. Thanks, Mlaffs (talk) 18:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Swissotel Quito
Well. I could not speedy under G4 as it was speedily deleted. I think it does assert significance, but don't believe it has independent notability. Redirect to main company's article is a possibility. I gutted the promo fluff and irrelevant puff. It may be that the creator has training in marketing or communications. They, I believe, have trouble sometimes writing for an encyclopedia. They need a semester with my linguistics prof. He'd show 'em how to write concisely. Dloh cierekim  23:58, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD:Reverse scientific method

 * 1. Admirable user page of yours! I love it!
 * 2. Please, go make your voice heard in the discussion Articles for deletion/Reverse scientific method!

Rursus dixit. ( m bork3 !) 14:28, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Armorial Nord-1
Thank you for finding various typos and minor errors. However the removal of the blank lines significantly impairs readability, so I undid your edit, then went back and added the various corrections you made. It's tough enough going through and finding things in a huge list even with a little human friendly whitespace, without it, it's that much worse. --David V Houston (talk) 13:10, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Calmer  Waters  05:38, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

BC —> BCE
Hi, C6541. I know it's been a while since you've contributed, but I'm just noticing some of your contributions where you've changed BC to BCE or AD to CE, such as this one. As per our policy regarding era notations seen at WP:ERA, edits such as these are not to be done unless there is a substantive reason for doing so, or consensus has been reached to do so on the talk page. Please avoid making such edits in the future; I used to do this as well, and I've learned from it. &mdash; CIS (talk | stalk) 19:53, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Dextroamphetamine 3d.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dextroamphetamine 3d.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Leyo 22:38, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Theresa M. Kelly for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Theresa M. Kelly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Theresa M. Kelly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shannon Rose Talk 17:21, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 17:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC).

File:Levomethamphetamine-2D.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Levomethamphetamine-2D.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:55, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Racemic methamphetamine.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Racemic methamphetamine.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:55, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Commons
Thank you for uploading free images/media to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Moving images to the Commons (you may view your previous uploads). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!


 * Thanks for moving File:Mexacarbate-Skeletal-2D.svg to Commons. I just noticed that the H on the N is missing. Could you please add it? --Leyo 17:12, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Mexacarbate 2D.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mexacarbate 2D.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 07:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited Amylmetacresol, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages OTC and Oral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Author contact info
Author/C6541 - The rotating gifs are beautiful. Would like to follow up. Please consider creating an email address to allow follow-ups about renderings/animations of molecules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.70.110.88 (talk) 03:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

July 2012 Study of authors of health-related Wikipedia pages
Dear Author/C6541

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Methamphetamine. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please visit my Talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 22:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If you can e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk and I will send you more info and instructions. Also saw your survey response. Thank you C6541!Hydra Rain (talk) 14:47, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Tape baking
An article that you have been involved in editing, Tape baking, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Popsup (talk) 21:49, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your AWB edits
Please examine your edits with -1 byte difference. None of them should be saved, as they clutter various logs. Please reconsider your use of AWB. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Beedi
Hi, thanks for your work on the Beedi page, but the inter-sentence citations, while annoying, do serve a purpose. Perhaps it would be better to use the style "for X fact, see Y citation" instead of removing all the citations to the end of the sentence? See superscript number 18, at the end of the sentence "Both the US and Canada have banned flavoured cigarettes" to see what I mean. Thanks, Fleetham (talk) 01:51, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Introduction
Hey there! We seem to have similar interests and I've seen you around on a lot of the pages I've been editing. Also, thanks for the barn star. Anyway, let me know if you see anything related to psychoactive substances or neurochemistry that you need help with or that you think needs to be done. I haven't been editing Wikipedia long but I've certainly realized that there's a ton of work that needs to be done. I'd love to be able to collaborate on something if you find an article or section that needs a major renovation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exercisephys (talk • contribs) 18:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Working out the details at Today's article for improvement
The RFC for TAFI is nearing it's conclusion, and it's time to hammer out the details over at the project's talk page. There are several details of the project that would do well with wider input and participation, such as the article nomination and selection process, the amount and type of articles displayed, the implementation on the main page and other things. I would like to invite you to comment there if you continue to be interested in TAFI's development. -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 02:39, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

An invitation for you!

 * Thanks for joining the project! Happy editing, Northamerica1000(talk) 00:25, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trazodone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syncope (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

re: Monsanto & American Drug War
If we had to guess at the connection, it would be that Monsanto produces the chemicals ("Roundup Ultra") used to fumigate crops in Colombia. Aloha, groupuscule (talk) 00:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I suppose, me personally I would only include films that the main topic is criticizing Monsanto, fairly or unfairly.  C6541  ( Talk ↔ Contribs)  03:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)