User talk:CAJH

Skids and Mudflap in DotM
Despite your best wishes or gut feeling or whatever, the Twins haven't been officially confirmed for the third film, so stop adding them. Remember that adding unsourced information constitutes vandalism. --uKER (talk) 18:13, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, neither have some other characters. So, why you keep them on that page? --CAJH) 20:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Such as...? --uKER (talk) 19:26, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Starscream or Ratchet. There has been only rumors about Starscream, not anything official. And only fans have said that recolored Hummer H2 being Ratchet with new paint color. Ironhide and Sideswipe really return, but they're not very different from their previous lookings. Well, if you won't accept proofs like toy lookings. Could you please explain what do you accept? Then I'll promise to add information that only fulfills what is needed for acceptation.--CAJH) 21:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, set pictures have been used as proof for almost all of them. The problem is Bay said Skids and Mudflap wouldn't return, and that's what made people more reluctant to think it was them. --uKER (talk) 19:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * You still remember misinformation campaign? Megatron's return in ROTF was once denied by Bay, until Orci confirmed that Megatron returns. I knew all along because I had seen concept art of Megatron. After Bay denied return of the Twins, I believed it until those images of new Sparks appeared. That's why I believe in return of the Twins. It would be stupid logic to create Autobot characters that are too similar than characters that won't return. --CAJH) 8:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Blackout/Grindor ring a bell? --uKER (talk) 06:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Blackout was killed in first movie. And when character like Blackout appeared in ROTF trailer, I first believed it to be Blackout, until it was revealed to be Grindor. Well, but in DOTM all dead characters will stay as dead.--CAJH) 8:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * They don't have to die. Characters in Transformers change names all the time. Megatron/Galvatron, Hot Rod/Rodimus... --uKER (talk) 14:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Because of their modified or rebuilt bodies.--CAJH) 17:59, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ShockwaveDOTMgamepromo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:ShockwaveDOTMgamepromo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ABS-YotD.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ABS-YotD.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 00:49, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Dobson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Quinn Lord is known for the "little sparrow"
Do you know why these two words (little sparrow)can´t appear in one article with Quinn Lord?--217.255.237.117 (talk) 18:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Because it's not a part of his name. Whoever does it, it's nothing more but sabotage. --CAJH (talk) 15:37, 6 March 2013 (EET)

It´s not illegal to give stars a name. --217.255.239.163 (talk) 17:31, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Perhaps. But it doesn't have to do anything with Imaginaerum. --CAJH 21:31, 6 March 2013 (EET)

It does have to do with all films from Quinn Lord. --217.255.239.163 (talk) 20:04, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * No point in trying to reason with a grown man who posts odd tribute videos to a child. Nuff said. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:11, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Ihr glaubt auch das Netz gehört Wikipedia und eure Sekte bestimmt darüber was darin erscheinen darf. Aber ihr seid erbärmlich. --217.255.245.20 (talk) 02:34, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * This problem wouldn't exist if editing of Wikipedia would only be available for registered users, not for people like you. --CAJH (talk) 11:44, 10 March 2013 (EET)

July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=562715434 your edit] to Angry Birds Toons may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:08, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * | class="wikitable sortable"
 * | class="wikitable sortable"
 * Well, it's not me who did it? CAJH (talk) 20:12, 3 July 2013 (EET)

Transformers 4
Hello. I see that you are a major contributor to Transformers: Age of Extinction. I just wanted to let you know that I removed 99% of sources from "TFW2005.com", as that is not a reliable source per it being a fan forum. I will try to help when I can, but all of those sources need to be replaced with reliable sources (such as Deadline.com, The Hollywood Reporter, Variety, etc.) or the info has to be removed if it can not be sourced elsewhere. Please note that this is not a blame on you, I just wanted to inform you as I saw you were the top contributor to the page. And if TFW2005 has been deemed reliable somewhere else, please forgive me. But it does not look reliable to me. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I could forgive you, if you would find new sources for those informations. - CAJH (talk) 20:30, 2 February 2014 (EET)
 * Like I said, I'll try my best to assist. But it would have been better if that site was not used in the first place. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * It was the most known site among the Transformers fans in Wikipedia. And I'm not sure about this, but some the info may not even be even available in pages you mention. I've been the most active one, since I feel that no else follows the article (and few others as well) as much as I do, and at least because of vandalism it's a good thing. The first movie was the only movie where I was patient enough to let rest of the info stay as a secret until the release date, but only because I knew nothing of the movie until the end of year 2006. - CAJH (talk) 20:45, 2 February 2014 (EET)
 * As a secret for myself, not the Wikipedia. - CAJH (talk) 20:46, 2 February 2014 (EET)
 * I'm sure that may be the case, but that doesn't necessarily constitute it as reliable for this site. Briefly looking over the page, some of the info that was sourced by it, may not be proper for the article in its current state. Wikipedia is not a news article, so we have to pick and chose the info that is given to us from reliable sources and try not to report on every little detail, especially the rumors and content gained from unreliable sources. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:08, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I've decided to remove all TFW2005 sources from the Finland's (my home country) version of Wikipedia. And replace as many of them as possible. And if that makes me more respectable as a user of Wikipedia, I'll do it. - CAJH (talk) 8:35, 3 February 2014 (EET)
 * Sounds good. And it most definitely would. I hold high esteem for users who work on here that strive to write articles with only reliable sources, as do many others. It will give you more credibility as an editor. So as you may have seen, I've started the resourcing process. It will take a while, but it will get done. Just of note; I started with the casting sources, and I have not gotten up to a point in time where the main three get their character names. As far as I've gotten searching, they are still just actors in a film, with not character names. That is why I made a few of the edits I did (at least for the time being). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 06:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Source "banning"
Just to be clear (regarding this edit), there are very few situations where a source is "banned". The situation is better described as TFW2005 not being considered a reliable source (as it exists today), and thus not being usable for any major/large claims in our articles. I just thought "banned" was a strong term, and wanted to be clear that the site could be used in the future if it became more reliable. =) Happy editing! —Locke Cole • t • c 12:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for this Locke Cole. I don't believe I ever used the word "banned" in explaining the reason why it can't be used, but I've been so busy on and off Wiki that it may have passed over me. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Just wanted to have a shorter explanation. But I forgot that it's not equal with word "clear". - CAJH (talk) 15:30, 9 February 2014 (EET)

New Dinobots
Indeed, we saw the toys of the Dinobots Slug, Scorn, and Slash at Toy Fair. However, reliable sources (and people who actually attended) got confirmation of those characters being included in the Dinobot roster for the fourth film. If you look at the pictures on the website I provided, you'll see they confirmed the appearance of Slug and Scorn, and by looking at their toys, you can define their dinosaur alternate modes. I just believe it should be added to the character list, since people who attended Toy Fair got confirmation of the characters being included in the movie when Hasbro revealed the Dinobots will be transforming into their robot modes in the movie, too. Screen Rant even tweeted about it: https://twitter.com/screenrant/status/434753730886791169. The toys have proven to be quite accurate in the past, since Transformers is a toy line. Name changes more than likely won't occur, since some Dinobots are already being renamed (ala Swoop) or some new ones being created specifically for the live-action universe. - DecepticonsFTW (talk) 14:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Twitter is somewhat of showing information unclearly. Besides, this isn't about character names, it's about seeing them both in toys and film. And if my words aren't convincing, maybe you should ask opinion of Favre1fan93. CAJH (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2014 (EET)
 * This is actually an okay source to use. Good work Decepticons. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If you say so. But how did you see this? Because I mentioned you? CAJH (talk) 17:07, 16 February 2014 (EET)
 * So, they can be included or not? Also, the film has yet to release, but we have seen them in the toy line. Of course, being in the toy line doesn't very well confirm that character appears in the film, but when sources are told directly from Hasbro that those characters will be featured in the film, they're officially confirmed. - DecepticonsFTW (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed. CAJH (talk) 18:16, 16 February 2014 (EET)
 * CAJH, I saw the discussion, as I am watching your talk page, because we have been actively talking in this discussion, even if there are dry spells. I apologize if I was unclear before, but I gave approval to the ScreenRant web source, not the Twitter (which DecepticonsFTW ended up using). I understand your reservation, but they do indicate that all the toys revealed will be in the film. Both of you seem to have a better understanding of where to get the information to, and I think you're both doing a great job. I still have the article watchlisted, so I may chime in here or there. Even though I can't actively edit the page, if you drop me a line regarding a source, I can comment on it for you. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Is it possible that we can get Gfyd to stop with the editing of the character list? He continuously removes all of the confirmed information from the site provided. - DecepticonsFTW (talk) 00:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Recent Trailer
Ever since that trailer has dropped online, there have been tons of disruptive edits, backed up by no official confirmations or sources, but rather analyzations of what was seen in the trailer. Could you assist me in getting the page protected or just simply editing out all of the information added? It would be a big help. Thanks. - DecepticonsFTW (talk) 12:20, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Editing is all I could do. I don't know if I have rights to make any articles protected. - CAJH (talk) 18:03, 6 March 2014 (EET)
 * This has nothing to do with the title, but, for that new edit, there were multiple Chevy Traxes seen being filmed during the Hong Kong shooting, following both Stinger and Galvatron, as well as a slew of sports car in vibrant colors. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWpUWsP_trc&feature=youtu.be I think we should add the fact that there were numerous Traxes on set, because we have visual proof. It may not be a technical source, but it's proof. Besides, it may just end up being a random Decepticon drone. - DecepticonsFTW (talk) 21:22, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I'm don't know the rules of Wikipedia as well as FavreFan knew. - CAJH (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2014 (EET)

Two New Dinobot Reveals
Due to the promotion of Transformers 4 on Frito-Lays in Turkey, a member of TFW2005 has collected most of the bags and has obtained passwords which unlock character images. He's revealed most of the known characters, but, he also revealed some new additions to the Dinobot roster: Snarl and Slog. Slog is basically G1 Sludge with movie treatment, but, the reason I come here is to ask should we include them. - DecepticonsFTW (talk) 00:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * You mean the character list of the Age of Extinction? Not yet. CAJH (talk) 07:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Skrillex Association
Is there anywhere on the page where we can include that Skrillex is helping to collaborate with the film's score? Where would it go? - DecepticonsFTW (talk) 04:29, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=613855223 your edit] to List of Autobots may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614059242 your edit] to List of Transformers film series characters may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:42, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * organic canines named Steeljaws' named "Wolves" in toy listings and trading card game to assist him. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91uoargJFFw Transformers: Age of Extinction -

Disambiguation link notification for June 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transformers: Age of Extinction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wreckers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm Dcbanners. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Legends of Chima, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dcbanners (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I guess I should have just not do anything rash. The Internet has no proof that the series will continue, but there's also no proof that season 3 was the last one. It's just like when Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu had its second season to end in 2012 (even though the toys were released in 2013), but its third season to start in 2014. CAJH (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Move request
A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series). Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Frank Welker
Hey CAJH, I saw your edit to The Last Knight's article regarding Megatron's voice actor. Here's the thing - Wikipedia has some weird restrictions regarding certain pieces of information being added, namely to The Last Knight article. Even though it's been made all but certain that Welker will return to voice Megatron, they still won't allow it. I'll put it like this - there's a bunch of weird aspects/rules to the article.


 * A few months ago I and many other users added Wheelie to the cast because he was briefly seen in one of the new trailers. However, the edits were constantly being undone, which was justified by Wheelie being "almost unnoticeable" in the trailer. Then, Slug was briefly seen in a recent TV Spot, so I added him to the cast. Despite being as prominent as Wheelie was, Slug stayed on the cast. I don't know what the difference there is. I added Wheelie to the cast again, just for the heck of it. We'll see what happens with that.
 * The article also lists several unnamed Transformers - one of which is a McLaren. Yes, there's a red McLaren in the film. However, at no point was this confirmed as a Transformer. So that information is purely speculation, yet for whatever reason it hasn't been removed.
 * Perhaps the weirdest aspect of the article is in the Decepticons section. There's a hidden statement only visible while editing that section. It reads, "DO NOT REMOVE GALVATRON, CAUSE OF MEGATRON'S RETURN IT HAS BEEN HINTED HE WILL BE BACK TOO. KEEP IT HIDDEN UNTIL CONFIRMATION". Not only is this a very informal statement, but it also implies that Galvatron AND Megatron will appear in the film as two separate characters - something that has never been confirmed, let alone hinted at in the slightest.

To sum it all up, there's not much you can do. The article's got some really weird rules and it's best to not get frustrated over it. The movie comes out in a week, so things will definitely change then.

LS100Studios (talk) 14:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * You didn't need to tell me that. I wasn't going to add Welker's name second time anyways, unless there's a source for it. CAJH (talk) 15:11, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Megatron Dark of the Moon.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Megatron Dark of the Moon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Feel free to do whatever you want for the image. But the image currently used in Megatron article for the film universe incarnation infobox seems overly large one. CAJH (talk) 18:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Questions about your recent change in Star Wars
Hello. I saw that you add a planet on the star wars planet database page. How did you knew the existence of that planet ? The film was not release.

Just by curiosity :)

Have a nice day !


 * By reading news and articles. It was not forbidden to add planets and moons of upcoming films into that list. I even added a source for that info. Didn't you read or even see it? CAJH (talk) 22:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

No, I didn't knew that. Thank you very much ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.183.210.78 (talk) 08:27, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message
--UTRSBot (talk) 09:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The unblocking happened faster that I thought. Thanks! CAJH (talk) 10:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ShockwaveDOTM.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ShockwaveDOTM.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:DOTMSentinelPrime.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:DOTMSentinelPrime.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)