User talk:CAPRAFILMS

CAPRAFILMS

Speedy deletion nomination of TOMY Thomas series
A tag has been placed on TOMY Thomas series requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 19:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michelle Stacy
A tag has been placed on Michelle Stacy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 19:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

SpongeBob
Do you have a source for the UK DVDs of SpongeBob? BOVINEBOY 2008 14:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peanuts comic adventures


The article Peanuts comic adventures has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * List of Peanuts characters with no context. Lead talks about upcoming series but rest of article is not related.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 16:26, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Peanuts comic adventures episodes


The article List of Peanuts comic adventures episodes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears to be about a potential series but no context. Possible WP:COI by article creator

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:22, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Hang on a moment
Please do not post too-short, nearly contentless articles and please do not engage in edit warring. A single sentence is not an article. PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:07, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Thomas tomy tomica trains for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Thomas tomy tomica trains is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Thomas tomy tomica trains until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  04:38, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

please unblock me
Can you please unblock me, i havent been editing in like 2 years, man. CAPRAFILMS (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Parlez Vous Woo
Hello, CAPRAFILMS

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MicrobiologyMarcus, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Parlez Vous Woo, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:


 * 1) Edit the page
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click the  button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And remember to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

microbiology Marcus (petri dish&bullet;growths) 21:11, 29 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello@MicrobiologyMarcus
 * I redirected the page, feel free to expand either the target or the original article with existing sources, according to what you think best. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank)  21:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with the topic. Two notes: your current redirect goes to another redirect which shouldn't be done. Second, shouldn't it just be reverted to the previous target? microbiology Marcus (petri dish&bullet;growths) 21:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I've let know about this discussion as it appears that they were the one to make the page from a redirect.  microbiology Marcus (petri dish&bullet;growths) 21:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC)