User talk:CAPTracker

Many people come to edit Wikipedia with mistaken ideas as to the nature of Wikipedia, and in perfectly good faith do things which are not in line with Wikipedia policies, and unfortunately you seem to have done so. The account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy, and both your editing history and your username indicate that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below.

Before making any unblock request, you should read the guide to appealing blocks. JBW (talk) 08:55, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Is your self-employment related to CAP Tracker in some way? 331dot (talk) 11:36, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * CAP Tracker is a website I designed/created. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CAPTracker (talk • contribs)
 * You only need one open unblock request; subsequent comments should be standard, unformatted comments. If you generate income from your website, you are a paid editor, you do not have to be specifically paid for your edits. What contributions do you want to make, specifically? 331dot (talk) 14:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

I've stated that I've read the COI rules/guidelines and agree to abide by them. I've also stated that I will include a COI statement on my user profile if advised to do so. Please point me to the relevant section of the relevant policy on this vetting process?
 * Please review WP:PAID. If you have any financial relationship with something you are editing about, or are compensated in any manner(not just money) you must declare it, this is a Terms of Use requirement. You stated you are self employed so I assume you derive income from your website. 331dot (talk) 17:05, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

I have read and accept and will abide by the Wikipedia policy on COI.
 * I assume you derive income from your website — comment added by 331dot
 * for some reason are dancing around compliance with WP:PAID. You also seem to suggest that you will continue to edit about your website — comment added by 331dot

So far this process has been characterised by inappropriate assumption and accusation, and no presumption of good faith. As such, this process appears to be flawed, and certainly is if 'this is the end of the the road'. I appreciate the motivation, but tyranny is trumping stewardship. Have you read/seen Minority Report?
 * Assuming good faith does not mean accepting everything I am told on blind faith. I accept that you may have good motivations, but you are not adequately answering my questions. You are free to make another request for review by a different administrator. 331dot (talk) 07:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)