User talk:CARAVAGGISTI

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- KHM03 14:31, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Bold textDA VINCIBold text Caravaggistsi: I don't know why you think you are the foremost authority on Da Vinci and Italian Rennis. paintings....Christ Carrying the Cross was fully attributed last year by Carlo Pedretti, foremost Leonardo expert in the world as by Da Vinci, and was further inspected by Alain Goldrich and Andrea Roche the two top conservators in the world and Martin Kemp of Oxford who concurred with Pedretti.. Leonardo's fingerprint is confirmed embedded in the paint....regarding the Titians, they were bought at Sothebys as Titian (June 1989)/(1931), I guess you don't buy at auction either or you would have known this....finally, the Raphael was sold at Christies in 1892 as "Raphael" and is featured in Burlington Magazine Oct. 1978....perhaps you should go find someone else to harrass.

François Duquesnoy
Your article François Duquesnoy needs cleanup -- it seems poorly formatted at the very least. You might also want to mark it as a stub.

Sources for School of Ferrara (Painting)
Hello. Thanks for your valuable contributions to art articles - this is much appreciated. In particular, I like what you did with School of Ferrara (Painting). However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Can you list in the article any websites, books, or other sources that will allow people to verify the content in School of Ferrara (Painting)? You can simply add links, or see WP:CITET for different citation methods. Thanks! Lupin|talk|popups 13:33, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
I just wanted to tell you thanks for Scarsellino and other valuable articles. Keep up the good work! And please tell something about yourself on your user page! Renata3 03:33, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Duplicate article at Bonifacio Pitati
It seems that your article an article for Bonifacio Pitati already exists at Bonifazio Veronese. I've redirected the article you wrote to the original one, however you had some details in yours that don't seem to be in the original, so maybe you could add more on it, thanks. - Hahnchen 21:57, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Churches and Monuments of Rome
I noticed that you included many churches of Rome in the Category about Monuments and sights of Rome; since all of the churches are already included in the "Churches of Rome" category, and since this category is already a sub category of "Monuments and sights", I would ask you to revert your edits. Best regards, --Panairjdde 18:46, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Your edit to Pierre LeGros
Your recent edit to Pierre LeGros (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Moved "Gertrude Goldschmidt" to "Gego"
Thanks for starting the article. I moved the main article as the artist is more frequently known as Gego. Gertrude Goldschmidt redirects to the article JRSP 23:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

List of artworks
Hi! Because I agreed with your comments on Talk:List of artworks, I nominated the page for deletion. Join the discussion, if you're interested. Skarioffszky 11:02, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Academy Saint Luke
Thank you for your kind words. You also are of course a lover of the great Michelangelo - and you know far more than I about art. (I'm merely clever at taking books and making a summary of them). Robb, in my opinion, is a journalist rather than a scholar - which is exactly what I see myself as being. He did a great deal of work before writing his biography, but in the writing he allowed (deliberately) himself to take a highly personalised view of his subject. It's great writing, but not really scholarship.

As for the article on the academy, it suffers from being too narrow - this is because it's based on to few sources. How important was it in subsequent art history? I have no idea. But this needs to be written proiperly - a job which you will be more able than I to do, as I don't read Italian. I will watch what happens with interest.

By the way, do you know the expatraite Australian artist Jeffrey Smart? He paints desolate, austere scenes, with something of Caravaggio's spirit - but without Caravaggio's hope of salvation. That's the true modernism of Caravaggio, his discovery of the isolation of modern man, in a world in which religion is a hope rather than a certainty. PiCo 13:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Andrea Meldolla
Can you check this ungrammatical quote from Freedberg you added on 15 Dec:

"occasionally, the sensibility - too receptive, almost feminine - that inclined Schiavone towards imitation brought him to the verge of echo of (Titian)".

Problem part highlighted - verge of echoing perhaps? Johnbod 18:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

ThanksJohnbod 23:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Nature Illustration
Please don't redirect from article space to category space. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Francois Nome
I have announced your article at WikiProject France/New article announcements. If you write more about France-related topics, please announce your articles there. Thank you, and happy editing, STTW (talk)  22:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Villa Farnese
Ciao! I reverted your edit to the Villa Farnese and Villa Rufinella, as they are not in Rome (to be near of it is not the same). Bye and good work. user:Attilios

Cannobio
Now, Egreggio Mr Caravaggisti -

I have removed all our arguments from this page as they serve no useful purpose. I am sure you would agree.

My request is that if we are to produce a meaningful page on Cannobio that it be done constructively.

I admire your contribution of the history of Cannobio and have taken the liberty of correcting some of the english, whilst leaving, in totality, your contribution intact.

I have reinserted SOME of my original contributiuon, leaving out your perfectly reasonable accusation of some of it being a little like Yellow Pages. I have no axe whatsoever to grind that these be left out, though would argue that as Cannobio IS primarily a tourist destination, at least a LIST of commercial entities - particularly restaurant...a source close to the heart of any Italian - be included, if no personal observations on their merit or lack of it.

I am relatively new to Wikipedia and therefore ask that if there is anything you, or anyone, objects to in the content of my contribution, they do me the courtesy of telling me - and this CAN be done politely - instead of arbitarily deleting everything. I am perfectly willing to learn.

THAT, to my view, is the spirit of Wikipedia - Even Wikipedia describes Encyclopedic as

An encyclopedia, encyclopaedia or (traditionally) encyclopædia,[1] is a comprehensive written compendium that contains information on all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge.

Castello
Thanks for creating a disambiguation page for Castello. The next step is to disambiguate the links to the page - check what links here. Warofdreams talk 01:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Now done to best of my knowledge. CARAVAGGISTI 02:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Help in edit war
Can I ask your help in the poll to dirime this edit war at Castelseprio (see talk:Castelseprio)? I've stumbled in somebody with awful style layout, nad probably one of those guys getting stuck like children in their version of any article. Bye and good work. --Attilios 09:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Peitre dure
The article Pietre dure needs some major revision. Mosaic is an ancient art, but lapidary art is a different art; it's jewelers doing stone, semiprecious stone and even precious stone, all finely polished and tightly fitted, unlike a bathroom floor or wall. Peitre dure is the jeweler's art applied to mosaic, with the grout sometimes made invisible.

Can we call Jacopo Ligozzi a jeweler? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MarkTwainOnIce (talk • contribs) 09:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC).

I vote no, unless someone has strong opinions yes. Jewelers have to handle precious materials with their hands. I have no evidence he did that, and likely did not. CARAVAGGISTI 15:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I have redone pietre dure, and would not mind a critique. The references/sources need to be tidied up somewhat, but that's for another day; the article also needs to be moved to the correct name-space.
 * I've also dug up enough to justify an article Galleria di'Lavori and/or Opificio delle pietre dure. --MarkTwainOnIce 19:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * PS, I need a translation for opere di commessi; "works of store clerks" is absurd in English. --MarkTwainOnIce 20:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Castelseprio
I would signal you the behaviour of user:Johnbod at Castelseprio: another personal attempt to put back the page at his will to a pre-Edir War version, when a large consensus had been reached to keep things as they were. He did an alleged splitting, but not the one discussed there. Bye and thanks --Attilios 01:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Torrelli
Not being the author, I can--and did --remove the tag. The prejudice against the fine arts here seems to be increasing-- - You've been here much longer than I have, but I do not know whether you follow the AfD debates--I do, mainly to rescue persecuted academics--, and the only way to deal with it is to build up the article in advance offline and never put in a stub. To prevent speedys, the trick at the moment is to include the exact phrase "He is notable for ..." using that exact word. Sounds nutty, but it works. The Grove ref there did not work at least from the US. I put in an additional one to the subscription version. I am trying to get it established that any artist (or musician) with a Grove article is Notable as a matter of course, and if you wish I will help--and ask for help--as needed. DGG 07:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Printmakers
When doing new artists PLEEEASE try to remember (if appropriate) to say "painter and printmaker" in the lead, to include & link the technique(s) used, and to categorise as "Category:Italian printmakers". Lets face it, Ghisi and Salimbeni are now better known as printmakers than painters, surely? You might also look at the new List of Printmakers to see who else is missing of your guys, Thanks  Johnbod 04:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, by the way, congratulations on your Barnstar from General attilios! Johnbod 04:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Cosenza and Palazzo Te
First, I don't appreciate what Johnbod has just wrote up here... he seems to be raging as he's lost the edit war on Castelseprio. But that's OK. I was asking you if you wanted to support move of Palazzo del Te to Palazzo Te here, of course if you agree. Also, I've started wikification of the mess at Cosenza. Bye and good work. --Attilios 23:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, if you support the move of Palazzo Te, you can add support in the survey section of the talk page there. Bye. --Attilios 11:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Couple of missing topics lists
Greetings. I have watched your handiwork for a while now. It appears that you are writing about artists, some of which have been linked to my lists of missing topics about art. I am hardly an expert so could you find time to have a look at the lists, at least as far as your speciality is concerned? - Skysmith 14:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you - Skysmith 12:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

A note
Ciao CARAV. Just a note for new articles you are creating. Don't forget to add the categories of births and death (see what I did in Flaminio Ponzio, for example), and to add the DEFAULTSORT template before categories list. Bye and good work. --Attilios 11:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I just found out about this myself: DEFAULTSORT is a magic words callup, not a template (note the "|" instead of the ":") and it must be in ALL CAPS to work correctly. Sorry for any inconvenience. RadioKirk (u|t|c)  20:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You're not alone... ;) RadioKirk (u|t|c)  21:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Italian or Florentine?
Hi - your views would be welcome at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Visual_arts Johnbod 17:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Concrete suggestions for Pederasty?
You criticized pederasty on its talk page a while back, but made no edits to the article. I've placed a POV tag on the page -- what are the changes you think should be made? Dan B † Dan  D  18:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

My comments elaborate in the discussion problems with the scholarship of the article, specifically that where there is a dearth of data, sodomy is confused with pederasty, and on the whole the article seems to suggest that pederasty is common. On the other hand, I do not want to re-write this article; I do not want to make it my focus. It is a contentious business of which I want no part of. My interest is the culture of the Italian peninsula mainly from 1600-1800. My intersection with pederasty was that one of the authors of the pederasty article was making octupus-like links to items of little relationship, and also using those articles to foward his view that "pederasty was commonplace" specially among the "luminaries of the time". He also made specific statements that were false, he made Michelangelo into a pederast, and the evidence of this is sketchy. The article of pederasty is a problems, for which I do not want to be the solution. I would warn the editors that some of the behavior exhibited by Haiduc and others could be seen as legally troublesome, if it means to link Michelangelo, a common topic for middle school children, to pederasty, and from there to man-boy organizations like NAMBLA. I am comfortable patrolling Italian art, I do not want to be responsible for what occurs in "pederasty". CARAVAGGISTI 03:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Giovanni da Milano
Ciao, Caravaggisti! Just wondering what rationale you used in changing the commonscat on Giovanni da Milano, such that he gets sorted on Milano. That doesn't make intuitive sense to me (any more than sorting Leonardo da Vinci under Vinci would) and isn't supported by the Getty Union List, my usual source for this kind of thing: Thanks in advance for clarifying. Planetneutral talk  17:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Pietro Paltronieri
Hey, Caravaggisti. I see you are creating artist stubs on notable artists and I'd like to thank you for that. However, could you please change the "source" section to the standard "references?" Also, could you please add the tag to the bottom of these pages so that they are not counted toward the article count in Wikipedia? I will go back and do this for the ones you've already created, but could you please do this in the future? Thanks.  JHMM13  05:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * OK I've given up at Giuseppe Gambarini of April 4th. I'd very much appreciate it if you go back before that and fix the articles. Thanks,  JHMM13  05:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar
You might be interested in your contributions. By the way, you can alter a setting in your preferences to remind you to leave an edit summary. It's always good to get inline citations in articles, so I've appended some info, but delete it if you're already familiar with it. Tyrenius 23:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Guide to referencing
Click on "show" to open contents. {| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: center; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em; font-size: 100%; " ! style="background-color: #f90;" | Using references (citations)
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" style="text-align: left;" |
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" style="text-align: left;" |

I thought you might find it useful to have some information about references (refs) on wikipedia. These are important to validate your writing and inform the reader. Any editor can removed unreferenced material; and unsubstantiated articles may end up getting deleted, so when you add something to an article, it's highly advisable to also include a reference to say where it came from. Referencing may look daunting, but it's easy enough to do. Here's a guide to getting started.

Good references
A reference must be accurate, i.e. it must prove the statement in the text. To validate "Mike Brown climbed Everest", it's no good linking to a page about Everest, if Mike Brown isn't mentioned, nor to one on Mike Brown, if it doesn't say that he climbed Everest. You have to link to a source that proves his achievement is true. You must use Reliable sources, such as published books, mainstream press, authorised web sites, and official documents. Blogs, Myspace, Youtube, fan sites and extreme minority texts are not usually acceptable, nor is Original research, e.g. your own unpublished, or self-published, essay or research.

Simple referencing
The first thing you have to do is to create a "Notes and references" section. This goes towards the bottom of the page, below the "See also" section and above the "External links" section. Enter this code:


 * ==Notes and references==
 * notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Cruftbane 21:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Carlo Frigerio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. &mdash; X  S  G  04:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Ciao!
Ciao, thanks for the nice additions. But, please, when using the cite book template, don't add the title between the  . Just write it without formatting, and it'll get out in italics automatically. Ciao and good work. --Attilios (talk) 11:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Cesario Renzi
A tag has been placed on Cesario Renzi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. &mdash; X  S  G  04:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Carlo Frigerio
I have nominated Carlo Frigerio, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Carlo Frigerio. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Keilana | Parlez ici 05:22, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Art Collection of the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Lucca
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Art Collection of the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Lucca, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Art Collection of the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Lucca. Littleteddy (roar!) 11:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Canaletto
I have conducted a review of this article which has a large number of issues which need attention. I have delisted it. The reassessment is at Talk:Canaletto/GA1. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:49, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello CARAVAGGISTI! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 12:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Rafael Coronel -

Speedy deletion nomination of Giovanni Battista Cerva
A tag has been placed on Giovanni Battista Cerva, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

duplicate of Giovan Battista della Cerva

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Grifter72 (talk) 15:42, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

prod

 * == Proposed deletion of Mario Lainati ==



The article Mario Lainati has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * He may be a painter but not many sources available about him

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 117.195.140.59 (talk) 22:19, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Francesco Baretta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francesco Baretta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Francesco Baretta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 08:41, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Jacopo Amigoni
Hello Thanks for your interesting article on Amiconi/Amigoni. I read it with great interest. I wish to make you aware of a possible "business connection" of Amigoni with Farinelli and composer Nicola Porpora which was reported by late 18th century British press. I found an article about Farinelli in the The Westminster Magazine: or, The Pantheon of Taste, vol. 5 (1777), pp. 396-397, which I am currently preparing for publication on Wikisource (i.e. I have contacted a user actively contributing to the music section in the English wikisource and who will hopefully find this piece of information useful). I do not wish to interfere in British/English wikipedia, hence I am sending you this link here, in case you wish to consider this piece of information.--Haendelfan (talk) 23:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luis Antonio Ribera


The article Luis Antonio Ribera has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "lack of sources to prove notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Placido Campolo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Placido Campolo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Placido Campolo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dr42 (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Bergamese painters has been nominated for renaming
Category:Bergamese painters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:34, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Milanese painters has been nominated for renaming
Category:Milanese painters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Neapolitan painters has been nominated for renaming
Category:Neapolitan painters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Bolognese painters has been nominated for renaming
Category:Bolognese painters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Angelo Nardi (referee) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angelo Nardi (referee) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Angelo Nardi (referee) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)