User talk:CARLOTTA ZUCCHINI

Welcome!

Hello, CARLOTTA ZUCCHINI, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Plan - Architecture and Technologies in detail, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Harry the Dog WOOF  14:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of The Plan - Architecture and Technologies in detail


A tag has been placed on The Plan - Architecture and Technologies in detail, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Harry the Dog WOOF  14:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses. Wikipedia is not the "Yellow Pages". If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets, such as WikiCompanies. Thank you. Harry the Dog WOOF  14:51, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Deletion
All sorts of problems still
 * It's not just the tone, you need to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines for journals. You have no independent sources at all, either to support what you are saying or to show notability. For all I know, the circulation could be 20 copies produced on someone's computer.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include:ensuring ease of reading and reference... provide in-depth understanding... prepared with the utmost attention... Special focus is given.... These are aspirations presented as fact, and stand in place of any substantive content.
 * Fully capitalising the article title is spammy too, on your website it's The Plan
 * I can't see how this resembles the New York Times article
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your journal is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage o in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Fine, I've no idea what sort of time-scale "Requested Articles" works on, or whether they accept everything. The alternative is to do a draft here, and let me know when you are ready (if you want me to take a look)  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  17:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)