User talk:CDavidE08

March 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Raymond Arroyo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 18:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello, I'm Heyallkatehere. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Raymond Arroyo seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Heyallkatehere (talk) 18:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The edit I made addressed posts that are by YOUR definition "less than neutral" and are absolutely opinion and out of context. Not sure how you can say my edit is "less than neutral" by comparison. CDavidE08 (talk) 19:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Raymond Arroyo, you may be blocked from editing. ''You cannot remove the cited opinion of a secondary source because it is "defamatory". Doing so is tendentious editing.'' JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 18:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Raymond Arroyo. JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 19:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


 * You DO realize that the part that my edits address in no way are "neutral" as you seem to require. I also have to wonder why YOU seem rather married to these slanted and very biased choices of quotes and opinions you seem bent on featuring. CDavidE08 (talk) 19:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


 * You've mentioned that the remarks have been taken out of context. By those commenting (The View, etc.)? By Wikipedia editors? What is the context you think is missing?  signed, Willondon (talk)  19:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The cited opinions of a reliable source may be stated in an article, and doing so is usually neutral. You can do 1 of the following:
 * Add another opinion of a reliable source contrary to the other, or
 * try to come to a consensus with me, based on Wikipedia policy. In addition, what context is missing, as asked above? JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 19:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Ah I see...so are you also judge and jury of "reliable source contrary to the other"? Just as you seem to be sole judge and jury of "neutral"? Just curious. CDavidE08 (talk) 19:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * No, I am not. I am not "sole judge and jury" of anything. The community is the final determiner of article content. If you would like to go to the talk page of the article or add another opinion, this can be resolved. JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are NOT the sole judge and jury, then why are YOU the ONE with whom I'm having to deal? Who is part of this COMMUNITY about which you speak? A star chamber of two, three, four, sixteen, twenty, two thousand? You all certainly have quick meetings and hand down quick, almost instant decisions. Pretty unusual for anything run by a committee/community. CDavidE08 (talk) 19:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


 * What is the context you think is missing?  signed, Willondon (talk)  19:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Raymond Arroyo
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Raymond Arroyo. JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 19:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
 You have been blocked from editing the article about Raymond Arroyo directly, to prevent further edit warring. The block automatically expires after a year. It would normally not have an automatic expiry date ("indefinite"), but indefinite one-page blocks can be tough to impossible to appeal, and the automatic expiration is meant as a way back to a non-blocked account that doesn't require writing an unblock request. You had already been blocked for the same behavior on the same page with a previous account. The block does not prevent you from making useful edits to any other page, and it does not prevent you from discussing the matter at Talk:Raymond Arroyo, nor from making an edit request there using the edit partially-blocked template. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked earlier, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 23:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, CDavidE08. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Raymond Arroyo, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 23:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)