User talk:CFCF/Archive 7

Agnes Martin and the google doodle
If you want to war over that google doodle being mentioned in the article on Agnes Martin, perhaps you should take it to the Talk page. I read the brief discussion you linked, which seems to include the opinions of a few and no tallies of articles about men and women compared to google doodle about noting men and women. Wikipedia marks some articles by putting them in Did you know..? on the Wikipedia main page. Do you routinely delete that from the article's talk page? Google honors people, not articles, by new artwork to honor the person. I sometimes know the person, but like so very many people, I go to the Wikipedia article to learn about someone new to me. The articles are usually edit-locked for the time the doodle is up, to discourage the many people who thoughtlessly edit the articles. Do you think it is an insult to the person's memory to be remembered? Is that the case? The arguments at your link were somewhat convoluted, that you will delete mention of a google doodle, and a link to it, for articles about women because if there is a google doodle about a man, it is not mentioned in the article about the man. If that is true (and you provide no evidence), why not add mention of the doodles about men, as your grand Wikipedia project instead? At any rate, the text has been knocked out and added back in twice now, so it is time to make a stronger case at Agnes Martin as to why that real event about her in popular culture must be censored from the article. --Prairieplant (talk) 11:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Anatomy Newsletter #4
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikimania meetup notes
Hi, have you posted your notes from the meetup anywhere? Could not find them via that page. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:08, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know, we were too many editing the notes so I guess everyone though someone else would post them. Available here, will be sent per mail soon! -- CFCF  🍌 (email) 06:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Women
Hi, I see you recently joined WikiProject Women in Red. I've made a proposal to merge this project into WikiProject Women at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red, so we can not only cover missing articles but focus on general quality of women's biographies. If interested please put your name down on the WP:Women page at the bottom.♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:03, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

TAFI's List of articles



 * Hello CFCF:


 * A discussion is occurring at the TAFI talk page regarding potential changes to the project's List of articles page. Your input is welcome at the discussion.

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 04:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 July 2015
* Read this Signpost in full* Single-page* Unsubscribe* MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom case "Editor conduct in e-cigs articles" has now been opened
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 18, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Investigation
I saw a notice that my username is added to an investigation. I have absolutelly no relation to any of those editors, I am from Venezuela and edit mostly pages of Venezuelan  people. --Eleonora Venezuela (talk) 20:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Edit Warring
Stop edit warring...Modernist (talk) 23:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Non-free rationale for File:08klemperer.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:08klemperer.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Acupuncture
Please watch WP:3RR. --Neil N  talk to me 21:23, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Acupuncture DS alert
~Adjwilley (talk) 23:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I realize you're probably already familiar with discretionary sanctions from your time over at Electronic cigarette but I'm required to use the whole template anyway. ~Adjwilley (talk) 23:10, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:08klemperer.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:08klemperer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

3RR
It would be gracious of you to revert your fourth RR at Calf. We do need to discuss the issue and per WP:BRD, the WP:BURDEN is on you to justify the change, so if you could please leave the status quo in the main article, it is the appropriate behavior. Montanabw (talk) 20:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Please see over the history, you are mistaken. CFCF   💌 📧 20:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)