User talk:CFCF/Archive 9

=May 2016—=

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ratel (talk) 22:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Your recent editing history at Suicide bag shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Banner talk 23:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Only warning
Do not touch other editors comments without their explicit permission per WP:TPO. If you're going to move debate and disporvals of Suporters comments, you must also move debate and dispoval of Opposers comments as well. I am specifically objecting to this revision. I will manually un-splice your failure to follow the guidelines under my issues and collapse your attempt to shape the discussion to your desires. Do this again and I will open a ANI seeking to have you restricted and sanctioned for this failure. This is not the first time other editors have noticed this and I will not put up with it. Hasteur (talk) 18:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * — be informed that the editor who did this changed others comments — and a introduction of 24 or 6 independent comments in a field where it explicitly told you not to comment is spam. Moving it out to the independent discussion area where everone else has chosen to partake in discussion is not in violation of WP:TPO. Carl Fredik   💌 📧 18:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Repeated WP:TPO violations by CFCF on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Archive.is RFC 4. Thank you. Hasteur (talk) 18:58, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 👾


A tag has been placed on 👾, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. nyuszika7h (talk) 09:05, 12 July 2016 (UTC)