User talk:CFDMTD

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, CFDMTD. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Wind engineering, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. ''This also applies to Wind energy software and Wind resource assessment. '' TJRC (talk) 18:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm TJRC. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Wind Engineering because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. This also applies to Wind energy software and Wind resource assessment. TJRC (talk) 18:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Meteodyn WT
Hello CFDMTD,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Meteodyn WT for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 14:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)