User talk:CGSexyPhat

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! VasuVR ( talk,  contribs ) 03:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of Shayne Lewis and Dinah Marler
A tag has been placed on Shayne Lewis and Dinah Marler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. VasuVR ( talk,  contribs ) 03:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Othbrooke.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Othbrooke.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Images
When it is clear that an article is being edited by another editor or more, talk images over with that editor or other editors before changing them, as you did to the Kendall Hart Slater article. That image has been reverted back to what I feel is the more flattering one.

At least you reverted back to the image that was already there in the Greenlee Smythe article after uploading an image that was not even of Greenlee but of her and Ryan. Flyer22 (talk) 05:48, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:GreenleeRyan.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:GreenleeRyan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:GreenleeRyan.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:GreenleeRyan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:GreenleeRyan.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:GreenleeRyan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ryan Lavery and Greenlee Smythe
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ryan Lavery and Greenlee Smythe, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Article describes a single element of a TV series in an entirely in-universe style, which is highly discouraged under WP:INDISCRIMINATE. No reason is given as to why this subject is notable enough for a separate article.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bettia  (rawr!)  15:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you may do and take a look at the welcome page, if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. srushe (talk) 19:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Ryan Lavery's age?
Do you have a source that proves Ryan Lavery's age or date of birth?Rocksey (talk) 15:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes it's on Soap opera Central.Ryan Lavery CGSexyPhat


 * Then why didn't you add it as a source?Rocksey (talk) 16:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

I'M NEW AT THIS WHOLE WIKIPEDIA THING AND I DIDN'T REALLY KNOW HOW TO DO THAT.CGSexyPhat


 * No need to yell. I'm sorry though, I should have considered that. Here's a style guideline to look over WP:REF and a template WP:CIT.Rocksey (talk) 17:41, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

i'm not yelling --CGSexyPhat (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * OK :) I'm removing the unsourced age until it can be sourced. Though, I'm not sure Soap Central is a reliable source since it's a fansite and I've seen some inaccuracies in their material. Rocksey (talk) 16:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

that's okay.--CGSexyPhat (talk) 16:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Christina Boudreau.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Christina Boudreau.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:08, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I did thank you. --CGSexyPhat (talk) 01:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Nicole Walker.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nicole Walker.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:08, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Susan Daisy Lemay.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Susan Daisy Lemay.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Marina Mallet.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Marina Mallet.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Gallery main-0425 ali lohan reality.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gallery main-0425 ali lohan reality.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Stop uploading copyrighted images
STOP adding copyrighted images to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did on Ali Lohan. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images borrowed from other web sites, printed material, films, or other sources; such additions will be deleted. Note that Wikipedia policy does not allow use of a non-free image on the page of a living person. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 18:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

okay i will thank you.--CGSexyPhat (talk) 23:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Left2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Left2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Infoboxes
The headings "Spouses" and "Romances" make your additions of "Husband" or "Lover" just unnecessary clutter. In addition, please familiarize yourself with the MOS; we do not indiscriminately bold or italicize text. Thanks. &mdash; TAnthonyTalk 03:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

okay i just thought it make it stand out and look much nicer.but if you guy's don't do that i wont do it anymore. K --CGSexyPhat (talk) 15:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Trey Kenyon, Lucas Scott and Peyton Sawyer, etc.
What proof do you have that Trey is dead?

Furthermore, as far as I know, the sex of Lucas and Peyton's baby has not yet been revealed within the show nor has that baby yet been named. Until then, the baby's name and sex (whether through spoilers or speculation) should not be noted in either article. Flyer22 (talk) 05:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The same goes for Karen Roe in regards to your putting Andy Hargrove as her husband. Flyer22 (talk) 05:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Trey is dead. someone put on there that she was married to Andy Hargrove.--CGSexyPhat (talk) 18:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * What proof do you have that Trey is dead, though? I do not remember anything or anyone within the show stating that he is dead since he left the show. He went to prison. We have not heard whether he died in prison or is even out of prison. Flyer22 (talk) 18:47, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Greenlee Smythe image and contributing
It is better to talk over changing a significant image with the uploader of the original image, unless that uploader is not as active on Wikipedia. The new image you uploaded of Sabine Singh is a black and white promotional photograph of Singh that does not nearly show her resemblance to Rebecca Budig's Greenlee as well as the original image does. In addition, if you are going to change an image like that, uploading over another image, you also have to remember to change the licensing of the image. I mean, the original image is a screenshot, which is why it has a screenshot licensing. Your upload is a promotional photograph, which is why it needs a promotional license. For all of these reasons I have reverted this upload change.

On another note, think about visiting the WP:SOAPS talk page to discuss soap opera contributors needing to do more to help these soap opera character articles. It seems that you need a bit of mentoring on Wikipedia guidelines and policies, though. I can help you out with that, particularly with writing about fiction here in your case, and mentor you...if you are willing to better your contributions here. Flyer22 (talk) 22:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Jack and Sharon's divorce
Hey CGSexyPhat, when did Jack and Sharon divorce? You added that information back to each character's article and I'm just wondering if that's based solely on the signing of the divorce papers or on something more definite. Rocksey (talk) 03:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lindsay Hartley.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Lindsay Hartley.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpaceFlight89 15:23, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Christina Boudreau.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Christina Boudreau.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 19:14, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Julian Onetreehill.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Julian Onetreehill.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpaceFlight89 19:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nicole Kiriakis.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nicole Kiriakis.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 19:22, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Continued copyright issues
Please, whatever you do, kindly do not upload copyrighted text or images and then tag them as either public domain or leave them with no tags at all. This is a violation of copyright law and is taken very seriously. Someone took it seriously enough to report you for vandalism because of it. So please don't do it anymore. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:26, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cw-onetreehill-prt-ANichols 043482-113fc3-281x374.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Cw-onetreehill-prt-ANichols 043482-113fc3-281x374.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpaceFlight89 19:30, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

--CGSexyPhat (talk) 01:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Sorry! i'm done trying to contribute to this site please forgive me i really am sorry.

File permission problem with File:Nicole DiMera.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nicole DiMera.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 03:03, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Arianne Zucker.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Arianne Zucker.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 03:04, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Brady Black.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Brady Black.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 03:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Spoilers/Speculation
Please do not add spoilers or speculation to wikipedia articles, as you did to Carly Manning. It has not been announced on screen that Mia is her daughter, much less who the father is. Such content will be promptly removed. Please see WP:CRYSTAL if you have questions. Thank you for your understanding. :) Rm994 (talk) 21:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:2008-Lindsay-Hartley-CELEBRITY-PHOTO-L.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2008-Lindsay-Hartley-CELEBRITY-PHOTO-L.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Jack Merridew 19:35, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Lindsay Hartley. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jack Merridew 15:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

--CGSexyPhat (talk) 16:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)sorry for taking it off of there but it seems really crazy to put it up under the picture when it's there when you click on the picture but whatever my bad.

The purpose of that notice is to inform people of the situation; they may well not click through to the image page. Jack Merridew 05:29, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Lindsay Hartley (09).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lindsay Hartley (09).jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Lindsay Hartley (09).jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lindsay Hartley (09).jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Jack Merridew 16:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:ArianneZuckersideview.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ArianneZuckersideview.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Josette (talk) 01:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Melissa-claire-egan-small-thumb.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Melissa-claire-egan-small-thumb.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Tom-pelphrey-picture.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tom-pelphrey-picture.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 05:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Billiereed.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Billiereed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Ryan Lavery and Greenlee Smythe
Hi CGSexyPhat. I noticed you recreated/unredirected the Ryan Lavery and Greenlee Smythe article. Based on the look of it now, it will probably be redirected again, if not deleted all together. If you want to keep the article, I suggest you focus on improving it with real world context such as the creation and writing of the couple and the reception. Since the characters and the pairing have been prominent in the series for about decade now, it shouldn't be hard to find sources for it. Here are some examples of fleshed out articles that are sourced and focus on the fiction in a real world context: JR Chandler and Babe Carey, Bianca Montgomery and Maggie Stone, Jesse Hubbard and Angie Baxter. Hope this helps. See you around. Rocksey (talk) 07:19, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

can you help me i'm new to this and this is a little hard lol so i need a little help. and i don't want this page that i've try'd to work on be deteted please HELP! i need someones help.--CGSexyPhat (talk) 11:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The article must not only be WP:PLOT. Once you find reliable sources, per WP:Reliable sources, showing the couple's notability, then you can recreate it. Look at the examples above. Even Dimitri Marick and Erica Kane. I know what you're going through, but be patient. Do the research. Until then, the article must stay deleted. Flyer22 (talk) 20:45, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GreenleeRyanL.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:GreenleeRyanL.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:51, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GreenleeRyanWedL.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:GreenleeRyanWedL.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:51, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rylee.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Rylee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:58, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christina Boudreau


The article Christina Boudreau has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 17:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)