User talk:CGT dk

Speedy deletion nomination of CGT dk/Ældste/106


A tag has been placed on CGT dk/Ældste/106 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &int;eb²+1(talk) 17:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Limbo supercentenarians
Hi. I'm probably asking this question wrong guy but why so many supercentenarians case come limbo, that there are no update over year or two so we wont know if person has passed away or is he/she still alive?. Like Sobayia Sarran who has been limbo over two years and there is no single mention that she has passed away. Or Elsie Ward, oldest person from St Lucia who has mention at her 110:th birthday but no any mention about 111:th birthday. So if person has passed away then why it has not mentioned at newspaper or something that we know that person has passed away so we don't have to expect that he/she is still alive?62.72.229.12 (talk) 17:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Year End Championships
There are event championships that happen at the end of the year, and there are "The Year End Championships." Huge difference! You seem to be confusing the two up at the Caroline Wozniacki career statistics. The secondary event at the end of the year is for players that don't make the cut for the official "Year-end Championship." By the way your editing pattern looks very similar to banned editor User:Ryoung122. I sure hope you aren't the same person. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Of cause I know the difference. It is not at the same level as a tournament but are several places put in the same category. In the section Statistical Information there are six categories. One of them are
 * "... the year-end championships (the WTA Tour Championships and the Tournament of Champions), ..." marked with a yellow colour. Please tell me why it is wrong to think that the two tournaments are considered to be in the same category, when they are in the tables "Schedule" and "Titles won by player/nation" where Andrea Petkovic' win in Sofia are in that category ...? btw Your edit has messed up the count of finales without a proper correction and removed other useful information. And be careful with hasty accusations. CGT dk (talk) 01:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Let me be less accusatory and simply ask if you are the same person as Ryoung122? When readers look at the infobox and charts and see year-end championship totals, they correctly make the assumption they are the totals from the Official Year-End Championships... not the lesser tournament. If they get confused because the performance timeline seems to be a bit ambiguous with its categories, then we may need to look at that to make it less so. But we don't need to compound the problem. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Elza Brandeisz in Gerontology Wiki
Hi, I have a question to you: Are you the same user like in Gerontology Wiki. If yes, so perhaps it would be possible to correct the article about Elza Brandeisz. Becaus she isn't born in Budapest but in Rust in austrian county burgenland. It was at this time a part of hungary. (see here, but only in german) - If you an other user, so sorry and forget this message. regards from Austria.-- K@rl 09:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)