User talk:CGaijin

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Gaijinlogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gaijinlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Tom Feister.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tom Feister.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Tom Feister.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tom Feister.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

All facebook pictures are copyrighted Musamies (talk) 13:49, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Question ReneeMontoya.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:The Question ReneeMontoya.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Bwcul.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bwcul.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:00, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Cully Hamner
Welcome to Wikipedia. You removed content from Wikipedia with this edit of yours to Cully Hamner, but without providing a rationale for this in an Edit Summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi. Please do not remove content from Wikipedia articles without providing a rationale in an edit summary, as you did with this edit to the Cully Hamner article, in which you reverted the photo information to that of a previous photo, one which no longer exists on the Commons because it appears to have been deleted. In the future, please preview your edits, and/or check them after saving them. If you need help re-uploading that photo so that it doesn't get deleted, let me know, and I'll be happy to help. I'll then begin a consensus discussion on the article's talk page so that other editors can weigh in and provide a sense of the community's consensus on which photo is more desirable. If you are Cully Hamner, as you previously indicated, the community will take your feelings about the photo into consideration to a degree, but that does not mean that you get to unilaterally decide upon the selection of the photo, any more than I or any other one single editor. (Remember, no one owns any Wikipedia articles.) If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Please do not upload copyright-protected photos to Wikipedia under a claim of Fair Use, as you did with this photo, unless the criteria for Fair Use can be met. Those criteria include the lack of any free equivalent available to provide the same information, which is not the case with Cully Hamner, as there are a number of free-licensed images of him on Wikimedia Commons, one of which was the one in the article that you removed without any stated rationale in your edit summary.


 * In addition, you stated in your edit summary that this photo switch constituted an "update". However, the date on which the color photo was taken was October 12, 2012. The date given for the black and white image is 2012, without any indication that it was created prior to October 12. Thus, this is not an "update". Nightscream (talk) 01:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:CullyHamner2013NYC.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CullyHamner2013NYC.jpg, which you've attributed to a friend. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cully Hamner DC.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Cully Hamner DC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Cully Hamner DC.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cully Hamner DC.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Cully Hamner Infobox photo
Hi. In response to the question you asked in your most recent edit, I would be more than happy to replace the photo if an alternative photo of equal or superior quality were supplied, and which was not a clear copyright violation. The one you supplied is not, as it is black and white rather than color, and much of the detail is washed out by the harsh lighting. In addition, it is a photo owned by DC Comics, so it uploading to Wikipedia is a clear violation of their copyright, for which you have clearly been notified above, and will in all likelihood be deleted on June 22. Nightscream (talk) 01:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Cully - DSC00180.jpg


The file File:Cully - DSC00180.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)