User talk:CHARLESLESORCIER777

Editing with a conflict of interest
Hello, CHARLESLESORCIER777. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC)


 * It is clear that you are editing the article with a conflict of interest in order to present a specific POV. As outlined above, please ensure you are using the article talk page to request changes. If you have specific immediate concerns regarding the sourced content in the article, you can use this noticeboard to request input from experienced editors.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Trying to remove badly referenced statements
Fact: the allegations have been controverted. They is NO controversy. Fact: there was no reference to some of the statements used in the section. I wanted to remove them as per wiki's guideline. Fact: false statements are made in some of the references, but I understand this is not wikipedia's fault or responsibility.

My edits
I'm sorry. You accused me of possibly having a conflict of interest.

While I'm not new at writing, I am new to the wiki format. I didn't mean to erase the entire section on Richard Stanley's wikipedia entry. But wiki's interface was fighting with me. And suddenly the whole page was a mess because of one badly entered tag. Sorry, my bad. But that doesn't mean I have a conflict of interest.

I think I've now succeeded in removing the part that wasn't referenced.

Also, if a person's name isn't to be mentioned in a section title, I understand that. But when I started editing that, there already was a name in there. The article I referenced made clear that name was an alias. I merely wanted to make the title factual and accurate.

Hope all is good now.

I hope this is the proper place to respond. Again, I'm new to the interface. Forgive me.