User talk:CIOmoj

February 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Aisha Dikko, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from hijacking pages, as you did with Aisha Dikko. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Please also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Panian513 18:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * We are terribly sorry for this! A request came to update the wiki page with the current Attorney General and we went about it wrongly. We soon realized the mistake and reverted a lot of the edits.
 * I am still working on the reverts and also using the article wizard to create a new page for the current AG.
 * once again, we are terrible sorry about this! CIOmoj (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:CIOmoj/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:CIOmoj/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:CIOmoj/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:CIOmoj/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:CIOmoj/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://newsbalanced.wordpress.com/2023/08/21/congratulations-sule-shuaibu-kaduna-state-attorney-general-and-commissioner-for-justuce/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello CIOmoj. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:CIOmoj. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ''You have stated, in connection with Sule Shu'aibu, Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice at the Ministry of Justice, Kaduna State, that "I am the chief information officer to the Commissioner". This makes you subject to our paid-editing rules. --'' DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I do not have a financial stake. He is the new commissioner and i am a stationed information officer who works under his office. I also worked under the former commissioner. I observed the former commissioner's information still read "current commissioner" so i edited it to read "former commissioner" and i also decided to make sure the present commissioner's profile is also online when people search for him to get information about his bio and more. CIOmoj (talk) 12:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You do have a financial stake, because you work there (they do pay you, do they not?). Please just make the necessary disclosure; this is a hard requirement, and not an optional extra. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)