User talk:CJLJ

September 2017
It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account, for the simple reason that very often people come to Wikipedia and falsely claim to have copyright rights that in fact they don't have. Also, do not make the mistake of thinking that copyright law does not apply provided you state where you copied from. That is a surprisingly common mistake, perhaps because of a confusion between copyright and plagiarism.

Even if there had been no copyright problems I doubt that the drafts you made would have become articles, as they were unsuitable in various ways, such as that Wikipedia does not serve as a manual to give people advice or instructions on what to do in particular circumstances, and the fact that procedures and advice relating to one local weather service would be unlikely to be considered of general enough interest or relevance for inclusion. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)