User talk:CKChaneca

Formats
Hi, thanks for the contributions. Could you possibly follow the citation format used in the article? That would be much appreciated. Dates are like 21 June 2016. Names are like Smith, J.B. and citations are like. Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello CKChaneca, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Center of origin has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, CKChaneca. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add requestedit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 17:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I've looked over some of what CKChaneca and all of it so far - without exception - looks good to me. is it going to be a problem if I start adding back in the ones that I've looked at? Anyway CKChaneca I especially suggest {{ping}}ing me, {{ping|Invasive Spices}}, if you do want to suggest edits on the Talk: pages. I'll probably say yes every time. We certainly need the content you're adding - it's just not allowed if you're citing yourself, as MrOllie pointed out. (And if you're confused what [WP:MEDCOI] has to do with it: It doesn't. I've looked at your subject area and you're as far from that as you can get, so don't worry about that part.) Invasive Spices (talk) 18:22, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * As long as it is passing through a neutral editor I have no issues, though do look carefully - some of this was (near) identical text pasted into multiple articles, we should probably be linking rather than duplicating. MrOllie (talk) 20:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I see. Alright I'll do that. Invasive Spices (talk) 17:16, 27 October 2021 (UTC)