User talk:CLCStudent/Archive 26

Vandalism?
Hey! Based on a complaint about you at WP:HD, I looked into the mentioned edits and was a bit confused: why did you use the "revert (vandal)" option and uw-vandalism based on this edit? This seems a good faith edit. --MrClog (talk) 15:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)


 * It was both unsourced and controversial information. CLCStudent (talk) 16:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * That is WP:NOTVANDALISM and seemingly not permitted under WP:ROLLBACKUSE. --MrClog (talk) 16:05, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * (Friendly reminder - notification system seems to have failed. --MrClog (talk) 16:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC))
 * What notification system? I am getting my notifications just fine. CLCStudent (talk) 16:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, I saw you were doing some other things after I posted this here so I figured you may have not received a notification, apologies. My concern above ("That is WP:NOTVANDALISM and seemingly not permitted under WP:ROLLBACKUSE.") still stands. --MrClog (talk) 16:21, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I realise that my comment may be perceived a bit passive aggressive (absolutely not intended!) so I am going to give a friendly tip: using the "rollback (AGF)" option and simply inserting "unsourced" as the reason, combined with the appropriate user warning template would have been incredibely helpful for the user (who felt very discouraged after being marked as a vandal). I don't doubt that this was an isolated incident and that you simply misclicked/misinterpreted the user's edit, but figured a comment on your talk page was appropriate because the user was quite upset at the Help Desk. Keep up the good work! Thanks, MrClog (talk) 16:39, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok, I will bear that in mind in the future. CLCStudent (talk) 18:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)