User talk:CMChuck

"SoCal Uncensored" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect SoCal Uncensored. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 25 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 18:39, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. — Czello 12:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Casting aspersions about other editors
Hi, if you suspect sockpuppetry, please provide your evidence at WP:SPI. Making such accusations on any other page, especially without actual evidence, is rather a personal attack than helpful in any way. I have removed your inappropriate talk page comment. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I did provide evidence (I noted that the first account had restored revisions made by the second account 12 times in the past 2.5 months, and the two were corresponding within 1-2 minutes of one another on the talk page). If I erred in how I presented this (should I have provided links to the 12 edits in question? should I have made this case in a different venue?), please let me know, as it was never my intention to run afoul of Wikipedia etiquette guidelines. CMChuck (talk) 13:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, no worries. I haven't yet seen the specific edits yet, so I can't evaluate whether that's a reasonable suspicion. I'd also leave that task to those experienced with processing reports at WP:SPI; I rarely visit that area. All I can say is that, yes, the correct venue would be WP:SPI, and per its introduction, specific links to these edits ("diffs") would be required.
 * Regarding the talk page of the article, please focus on the content of the article. User conduct is best discussed on other pages, such as user talk pages (to talk to a user about conduct concerns), or WP:ANI (to report conduct concerns about a user). If you agree to separate conduct (-> SPI) and content (-> article talk page), I'll already remove the block. The re-addition of conduct concerns to the article talk page, on second look, seems to be rather a misunderstanding between us about my concerns than intentional disruption. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:19, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree to separate conduct and content. If I pursue this further, it will be via WP:SPI, not the talk page. CMChuck (talk) 15:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Unblocked – mostly symbolically as the block would expire soon anyway, but as promised. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Multiple accounts

 * ✅ to .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)