User talk:CMCwdawson/Oregon business plan

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was no move. JPG-GR (talk) 20:53, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

User:CMCwdawson/Oregon business plan → Oregon Business Plan &mdash; This page should be moved to the name "Oregon Business Plan" so that the curious public may search Wikipedia for this organization and can successfully find the page and learn about it. CMCwdawson (talk) 18:06, 23 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Support - non-controversial move from userspace to mainspace - but damnit I screwed up and moved the talk page, sorry for making work for the admins to clean up. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 21:10, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No sweat. I deleted the redirect.  —EncMstr (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)


 * This is not ready for mainspace. Unoriginal gibberish (what is "traded sector industries" supposed to mean? An article which found out and explained might be useful) and possible copyvio. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose It feels like there's either a WP:COI or WP:COPYVIO, but even if not I'm not convinced of the notability given the quality of the references. Needs copy-editing also. Aubergine (talk) 03:52, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose per Aubergine. &mdash; \`C RAZY `( lN )`S ANE `/ (talk &bull; contribs) 06:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Not suitable material for a mainspace article as it stands. The user should resolve the issues regarding COI, Copyvio, Notability, and lack of third-party sources before considering moving this to article space. --DAJF (talk) 06:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * How does this page look now? I am eager for feedback on making it wikipedia suitable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CMCwdawson (talk • contribs) 18:37, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Less gibberish, but get rid of the useless and ungrammatical quotation marks. What Wikipedia really wants are other people 's assessments of the OBP; if there aren't any, the Plan lacks notability. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose. As others have explained, numerous issues, including lack of notability, possible copywrite violation, possible self-promotion, and non-encyclopedic content (e.g. "it is important that..."). Quietbritishjim (talk) 22:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - not enough external input for notability, reads too much like an ad. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 22:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * More external input has been added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CMCwdawson (talk • contribs) 17:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move
User:CMCwdawson/Oregon business plan → Oregon Business Plan &mdash; This page should be moved to the name "Oregon Business Plan" so that when the Oregon Business Plan is searched in Wikipedia, one could find the page and learn about the organization and what its tied to. CMCwdawson (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC).