User talk:CMDAResearcher

October 2009
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. DanielRigal (talk) 21:46, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Please note that the above is the standard COI warning text. Please don't be put off by its tone. Your edit to CMDA wasn't problematic in itself and it has not been reverted. I just noticed that your username makes it clear that you are involved in the CMDA so I wanted to make sure that you know to be very careful about editing subjects you are involved with. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Your second edit is considerably more problematic. While adding more information is good the tone needs to be that of an encyclopaedia and you need to source all information with references. I am going to have to remove some sections that seem promotional or non-neutral. I will try not to remove more than I have to. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:09, 14 October 2009 (UTC)