User talk:CMGL

March 2024
Hello, I'm Synorem. I noticed that in this edit to Soneva, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 14:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sonu Shivdasani, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 14:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, as you did at Sonu Shivdasani, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism. Synorem (talk) 14:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * If you're going to label a large, controversial section as 'libel' please provide your own sources to debunk the sources that are currently listed in the content you continue to remove. Synorem (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Soneva. Synorem (talk) 14:38, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Sure - apologies for this - there is a smear campaign underway currently regarding Sonu and Soneva which is being dealt with at a legal level - I can share with you the legal letters if that is of help? CMGL (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * While I understand the content you're removing may be offensive to some readers, it is still factual information regarding these people - even if it has been settled. Unless your claims are that these cases never happened - in which yes, you'll need to provide some sort of source - then there is no valid reason to remove these sections. Synorem (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)