User talk:CO14expf

May 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Harry Reis has been reverted. Your edit here to Harry Reis was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://spsptalks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/its-not-a-matter-of-life-and-death/, http://spsptalks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/its-not-a-matter-of-life-and-death/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:29, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Benjamin Y. Hayden
About adding the "selected works" section to that page, please be aware of WP:NOTRESUME, point 1, and WP:YOURSELF. Thanks. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:03, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Mt. Hope Family Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Rochester


 * Sheree Toth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to NIMH

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jessica Cantlon


The article Jessica Cantlon has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Beefed-up CV. Awards are only minor. Web of Science lists 31 publications that have been cited 838 times (h-index=12). No evidence that any of the criteria of WP:ACADEMIC, WP:BIO, or WP:GNG are met. Article creation too soon.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 09:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Promotional editing
Please stop! I have now changed/reverted several edits of yours on several different articles. Wikipedia is not for promoting your institute. Articles need to be neutral and factual. Please note that people who persevere in promotional editing risk getting blocked. I strongly recommend that you read (if possible all) of the articles linked to above in the "welcome template", which will make it much easier for you to contribute to WP. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 16:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Benjamin Y. Hayden


The article Benjamin Y. Hayden has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Up-and-coming researcher. However, awards are minor and grants are what is to be expected of a young faculty. Web of Science lists 30 publications that have been cited 743 times (h-index=18) in this high-citation density field. Does not meet WP:ACADEMIC, WP:BIO, or WP:GNG. Article creation premature.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 16:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew J. Elliot, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 17:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Benjamin Y. Hayden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benjamin Y. Hayden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Benjamin Y. Hayden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Andrew J. Elliot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Jesus College


 * Mt. Hope Family Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Trauma

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Harry Reis.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Harry Reis.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January ( talk ) 21:47, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Professor Harry Reis.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Professor Harry Reis.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January ( talk ) 21:05, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)