User talk:COCHAT PIERRE

Speedy deletion nomination of International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA)
Hello COCHAT PIERRE,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 11:29, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Official logo of International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA).jpeg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. If you post an article it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation  claims or interviewing its management. Despite what you claim, large chunks of your text had no references, and the references you did give were not independent third-party sources. They included your own websites, social media and the websites of affiliated organisations, none of which are independent reliable sources.
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. You must read the criteria and its examples carefully.


 * You're so busy claiming what IPNA does, you don't tell us anything about the organisation you are writing about. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, funding or expenditure. I have no clue from what you wrote even what country your headquarters are in, let alone the city.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Non-profits, charities and religious bodies often think they are exempt from our advertising rules, that is not the case. Staring with a Mission Statement is a sure sign that we are going to get spam rather than facts. Some examples of the many unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: IPNA leads the global efforts to successfully address.... IPNA's vision is to promote the optimal care for all children with kidney disease.... played a critical role in... the regional IPNA societies have raised awareness and concern... renowned monthly journal... seminal comprehensive textbook... IPNA accomplishes these goals... GREAT CARE FOR LITTLE KIDNEY EVERYWHERE is the aim of the Association... IPNA strives to enhance the treatment of children&mdash; the whole thing is an advertising leaflet, not an encyclopaedia article.
 * the article was largely created in a single edit without wikilinks, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial, and text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. I didn't risk actually checking for copyright violation since my browser blocked access to your website with the message The owner of ipna-online.org has configured their web site improperly. To protect your information from being stolen, Firefox has not connected to this web site... Report errors like this to help Mozilla identify and block malicious sites, so you may have an issue there too.
 * Your user name is the same as that of the IPNA president. You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me?  09:08, 20 July 2018 (UTC)