User talk:CONeal19/Floodplain restoration

Mr. Jotatohead's Draft Peer Review
This is a really strong draft with a great amount of relative references. Some of the citations within the text were not in numerical order, but that is just a stylistic observation, not much of a hit on that. Also, talking about references, #6 & #10 are the same references. They have a different date, but when clicking on the links for each, they take you to the same place. Great article and flow of information overall. The usage of subtopics is always great, but here it was done really well. Clear separation of information between the sub-topics and did not find any information out of place or any that seemed like filler. Everything had a place, which makes it a very strong draft. The only thing missing here is a relative image. ````Mr. Jotatohead

External Review
Hello CONeal19 - My name is Jolie, and I'm the Project Coordinator for the WikiProject Limnology & Oceanography team. Your external reviewer for your article on Floodplain Restoration doesn't have a Wikipedia account, so your review was emailed to Dr. Chraibi instead, and she'll pass it along to you. If you have any questions about your review, or would like to clarify anything, please feel free to get in touch with me by email (you can send your message through Dr. Chraibi) or by leaving a message on my talk page. Thanks, and all the best as you wrap up your Wikipedia editing assignment! JoGDelta (talk) 20:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)