User talk:COYB01

January 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Madbrad200 (talk) 00:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

February 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bradford City A.F.C., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. GiantSnowman 19:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''You have been warned already about changing British to English without consensus. Stop.'' Madbrad200 (talk) 07:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Disambiguation link notification for April 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pretty Shining People, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chorus ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Pretty_Shining_People check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Pretty_Shining_People?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Cheltenham Town F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

OLINK
Hi. Please read WP:OLINK - specifically the what not to link section. There is no need, in most contexts, to wikilink places such as London, let alone major countries. Blue Square Thing (talk) 07:55, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at A.F.C. Telford United. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Tion Wayne for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tion Wayne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tion Wayne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 07:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Big Zuu
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2020–21 Cymru Premier table
Template:2020–21 Cymru Premier table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Boothy m (talk) 12:52, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited B Young, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dániel Gyollai


The article Dániel Gyollai has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 08:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Dániel Gyollai for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dániel Gyollai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dániel Gyollai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 10:53, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Josh Daniels


The article Josh Daniels has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. NB - AFD is for unrelated person."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 10:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Josh Daniels for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Daniels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Josh Daniels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 09:35, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

MOS:SMALL
Hi there. I just saw this change of yours. Just a quick heads-up: per MOS:SMALL, we should not format any text in the infobox to be. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 20:00, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 Shrewsbury Town F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lincoln and Gillingham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Ben Chilwell does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. ''Please also do not use the Daily Mail as a reference. See WP:DAILYMAIL.'' SK2242 (talk) 17:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Information orange.svg Please do not add or change content, as you did at Scott High, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 16:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Drizilik for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drizilik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Drizilik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 10:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sikh Hunters F.C. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sikh Hunters F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sikh Hunters F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 21:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the James Rowland (footballer) article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 07:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Musical groups from Shrewsbury


A tag has been placed on Category:Musical groups from Shrewsbury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:23, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm LTFC 95. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, David Edwards (footballer, born 1986), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LTFC 95 (talk) 23:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Nathanael Ogbeta
Not notable, so I have moved to draft space, see Draft:Nathanael Ogbeta, and also merged with my older draft. Please also note that Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. GiantSnowman 19:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Players will not actually be released until their contracts end on 30 June 2021
Please do not remove them from squad listings/change their articles until that date. GiantSnowman 11:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Oumar Niasse article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 10:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

April 2024
Hi COYB01! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 04:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)