User talk:CP\M/Archive2

Requests for arbitration/Israel-Lebanon
Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Requests for arbitration/Israel-Lebanon. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Israel-Lebanon/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitrane tion/Israel-Lebanon/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Tony Sidaway 19:02, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Off-wiki communication
In terms of the off-wiki communication with my mediator, while I can certainly appreciate Cerejota's reaction to finding out that something existed that he wasn't aware of, communication with the principals is an important part of mediation, and moreover, that communication should remain confidential. I don't understand what problem may exist, but let me know if you think there is one. Cheers,  Tewfik Talk 08:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't consider it inacceptable, and in one case I held some conversation in email, don't keeping the fact confidential. However, that was because a participant asked for this channel. It can sometimes be used, if, for instance, one has suspicions he is unsure about, and doesn't want to share yet, or if there's a suggestion author doesn't want to be associated with him. However, I think it should be done very carefully and only with compelling reasons. The problem is uniformity. It's fine if all parties communicate privately, but, when some write in the open, and some via email, it creates a certain degree of mistrust. In some cases a high degree, so the mediator, IMO, must be either sure that other parties don't feel uncomfortable about private communication, or have really compelling reasons. Most people just don't like to be discussed behind their backs. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 09:16, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I certainly appreciate your points, but I do believe that the communication does fall into the instances that you describe, and shouldn't be grounds for the mediator's recusal, especially being that (admittedly, I'm biased) we've made some real progress, and show signs of resolving the issue. Cheers,  Tewfik Talk 15:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Possibly it does. I just don't understand all of this. Well, one is free to refuse the mediation, and probably almost anyone from MedCab would leave if asked with reasoning, and if there were just two parties. But I don't get why would he ask for that - after all, it isn't that big deal. But, anyway, I start to think that something about private communication should be stated in our guidelines. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 16:10, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Wikipedia:WikiProject US Governors
Your recent edit to Wikipedia:WikiProject US Governors (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 07:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Just a comment - Impressive speed. I didn't even see the blanked page - the bot reverted it so quickly it got replaced between page saving and loading.
 * P.S. There was an old not-even-started wikiproject with only a template which I cleaned to make space for a new one. The bot wasn't mistaken, I really deleted most of the page; of course it couldn't distinguish an article from an unfilled and useless template.

CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 07:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Discussion continued
Doesn't this article fall into the deletion requirements? By the way, here are User:Aleverde's contributions. ~ clearthought 17:56, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Into speedy deletion, as CSD A7, or Unremarkable people or groups. With all my inclusionism, writing an article about each victim of a war isn't appropriate. Just being a victim implies an order of magnitude less notability than being in any garage band. My condolescences, but Wikipedia is not a memorial (it could be, I have nothing against), so I'll mark it as CSD. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 18:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * A note - I wrote the above after tagging as, and the article was speedied in meantime. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 18:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

CP/M
I was one of the last users of CP/M on the internet, using Lynx on an Amstrad PCW. How are you using CP/M? Fred Bauder 22:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, most of the time I just use my workstation or laptop with Linux or Windows to edit pages, but I still sometimes work in Internet using the PC at work or an old Toughbook, with CP/M-86 (and Lynx as well). The actual reason I use CP/M is using equipment with old controllers, with required utils only written for CP/M, and sometimes ISA cards needed as well, so that no upgrade is feasible. But I still list myself as CP/M user because it doesn't mean I use nothing else (I'm not -that- old-fashioned). And CP/M is today rare enough to be noteworthy, though not as exotic as it may seem - it was very popular in its times... though, well, I really don't need to tell that to you, I guess ;-). CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 23:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006
The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 12:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

MedCab
"Maybe it would be better to bring the issue on the talk page, and allow user group to decide for themselves what do they want to write on their page?"

This is a public forum and it deserves comment. If they want to "decide from themselves," countless ISPs will sell them server space! I don't expect my changes to last, but I do expect these people to take notice.Yakuman 01:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It's just like I don't decide what to write on your user page (not talk page) - despite it isn't private property, it's just commonly accepted way for someone to tell about himself. User groups have pages which serve a similar purpose. Also, mixing up first and third person is somewhat inconsistent. While it might be changed, the talk page is better for the discussion of major changes rather than edit summaries, and it isn't usually necessaty to implement changes for people to notice a suggestion. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 02:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Some Advice
Hey, you seem to know what you're doing, so do you think you could take a look at Camonna Tong and Kwama and give me some advice for them? As my "pet articles" I'd like to develop them some more but I've got a case of editor's block. I would put them up for review or something except I'm not entirely sure what kind of review they merit yet. Thanks your time. :) --Niroht 02:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * For Kwama, I'd suggest to put a screenshot for each section, and possibly expand the economic part, merge Mines section inside it. Also it would need a comprehensive lead, mentioning the hierarchy and importance of kwama mines as one of the main food sources.
 * I can't think of something for Camonna Tong - the material is quite limited, there isn't much to say, and not many concentrated sources. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 06:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the input, I'll see what I can do when I get time. --Niroht 17:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Request for mediation
Request for mediation; I would likes some third party insight. and. ~ clearthought 22:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll jump in now and try to suggest something. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 23:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your needed insight on the matter. ~ clearthought 00:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Pie chart updated
I have updated. There seems to be a temporary cease fire on Casualties of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict as discussed in Talk:Casualties of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. I am holding off reporting the 3RR violation of a dynamic IP address for now. Can you please comment. Carbonate 14:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Another update, info on the talk page. Carbonate 14:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Morrowind
I changed it because I felt that Morrowind wasn't of medium importance (ie notability), but rather was of "high low" importance. Additionally, it didn't get all that great of reviews. Despite that, it won't bother me, if you change it back (assuming you haven't already). - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, being quite a popular game even today, I don't think it is to be set to low. The Low rating is mostly either for in-game details (all other 100 articles about MW setting), or for games mostly not played and not remembered. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 20:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

re:WP:NAM
I have replied on the RFD location. We should probably keep this in one location, so if you have any furthur questions regarding this, respond on the RFD and I will moniter the page for recent changes. Thanks for asking for my opinion. Cheers! :) — Moe Epsilon  19:53 September 12 '06

House Made of Dawn
I think it might be too soon to call this one a success. See the page's history and User:HQCentral's talk page for details... Vizjim 19:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, we have found a consensus, it's only left to implement it, which for some reason wasn't done. I just closed the case so it doesn't hang around. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 21:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * More fun and games. Vizjim 09:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Typhoon3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Typhoon3.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rama 16:30, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Help With Javascript
I'm trying to put the tool that gives me a strikeout button into my javascript page and having no success. Now I understand little to nothing about programming, so could you give me a hand or direct me to someone who could please? --Niroht 20:18, 24 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not exactly familiar with browser javascript work, but it might be helpful to ask Tra. He knows javascript enough to write some tools, so I guess it won't be hard for him. Also you might ask Cerejota, he is a java programmer.
 * Or, maybe better, just check the categories - Category:User_js, Category:User_js-4, Category:User_js-3. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 20:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006
The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Israel-Lebanon
This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

Editors are cautioned that there may be exceptions to Wikipedia Guidelines and Style Guides due to unusual circumstances such as an important current event. Decisions need to be based on utility of the article to readers, not to literal compliance with Wikipedia rules. A diverse mix of blogs is recommended, but the extent and selection of specific blogs is a matter of content to be determined by the editors of the article. Any user, particularly Tasc, who engages in edit warring with respect to 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict may be banned from the article for an appropriate period. All bans are to be logged at Requests for arbitration/Israel-Lebanon.

For the Arbitration Committee. FloNight 03:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

LH2 is NOT more famous among every-one
("more famous among everyone" - I have NO IDEA who or what LH2 is (and Wik on the Net is too slow for me to run it down), but prada is, on the other hand, some-what known to me, though I am not at all into fashion. - sorry, this is beside the point, but Your statement did bug me. 10:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC) )
 * Actually I too have no idea and don't remember mentioning any LH2... What exactly are you refering to? CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 11:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

It should have been HL2, for Half Life 2. Kdammers 12:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Type 212 submarine
Thanks for responding so quickly.

Do you reckon it's a Coke or Pepsi can?

--A. B. 18:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

No vandalising the Reichstag!
Lol, good call! I gotta admit I fricken love that page! Gl e n 15:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

A comment on your vote
Hi CP\M - I made a comment on one of RFD votes here regarding the 'Redirect pages to South African farm attacks'. Would you please read my comment and consider my request. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you. Cheers, Jason Lionchow - Talk 20:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Your Mediation Review
Well, we decided that since Keitei has kindly offered us pizza, we won't roast you and eat you instead. Yep, you get to live, and even better, you get to keep mediating cases. Congrats! ~Kylu ( u | t )  22:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Please comment on WT:ATT
Please make your comment about naming on Wikipedia talk:Attribution. The proposal seems to be going forward at a goodly pace. Robert A.West (Talk) 23:55, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba 13:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

user:HQCentral
I notice your comments on User talk:HQCentral. We have just discovered that that user was a sock puppet of notorious plagiarist Primetime, who was banned by Jimbo. Long term abuse/Primetime, Requests for checkuser/Case/Primetime As a banned user all of his edits may be removed, and as a serial plagiarist all of his edits should be scrutinized. If you have a chance to review his article and talk page contributions on articles where you've worked with him it'd be a help. -Will Beback 02:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Not sure about him being a sockpuppet, though lack of attention to some things may suggest that; however, the user was editing quite actively, and at times constructively. Seems to have at least some real good intents (edited his analysis of House Made of Dawn), but often fails to listen to others. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 02:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Primetime has a love/hate relationship with Wikipedia. He adores the Encyclopedia Britannica and other printed encyclopedias. He thinks WP is horrible, yet has decided to improve it by copying in large chunks of text from other reference books while claiming they're his own work. Edits like this, , are classic cases or plagiarism. Furthermore, it's been proven by the Checkuser tool. His combativeness, such as HQC showed  the House Made of Dawn analysis, is also typical of Primetime. There's no question that he and HQC are the same person. -Will Beback 09:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Convinced now. He just acts not in a vandalistic way. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 10:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * We were all slow in recognizing his vandalism. He seems (more or less) reasonable, if sometimes bullying. FYI, I've posted a notice about his latest appearances here Administrators' noticeboard. Thanks for improving theproject despite these distractions. Cheers, -Will Beback 10:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, that's it. It is generally very uncommon for a vandal or troll to participate in mediation and even agree with compromises, but still I had a suspicion that he isn't the one who wrote the material (as he couldn't summarize it). Probably that's just so. I don't think he's a vandal, just completely locked on what he wants with little regard to others or to rules. However, some major edits would better be checked, as they might be copies, but not violations. Also, many could be rewritten, so it would likely be better to move them in the talk pages, unless evidence is present. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 12:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I appreciate your extending good faith to Primetime. That's an excellent habit. However there are some occasions when it's misplaced. I and others have spent a considerable amount of time reviewing his contributions and finding the sources. Based on that experience I can say that he hasn't made a single substantive contribution of text that wasn't copied. When confronted he lies and counterattacks. Due to his infecting the encyclopedia with plagiarized material and bullying other editors this person has proven a lack of good faith and is no longer allowed to participate. It's sad, but true. -Will Beback 12:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * (late, but) - Well, I'm not really arguing. You've just asked for my review of his edits, so I stated my impression - it happens that I hadn't really faced the dark side. I trust people who have more in-depth knowledge of his actions. By saying I think he isn't a vandal I mean his intent seemed to me to be not to deface/destroy Wikipedia, but to shape it to his vision, which is incompatible with real limitations, accepted concepts and requirements; well, to the extent I've seen his actions with that specific sockpuppet. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 20:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Editor review
Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Editor review/, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 01:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 00:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Serial Experiments Lain FAC (again)
Hi CP/M. I remember you helping out when I started working on Serial Experiments Lain, so I thought you might want to know it is undergoing FAC at the moment. I wish you a happy new year, a happy Eid el Kabir, and lots of great stuff. --SidiLemine 14:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It really changed a lot! Yes, now it really looks and reads fine, though might use some expansion. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 14:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll continue working on it anyway as I still have lots of unused material, but I wanted to know if it passed before the new year, as a kind of omen. ;) Cheers!

"Final solution" to Deus Ex related articles reply
That might be a good idea. Which article do you suggest? -- Grandpafootsoldier 03:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Probably UNATCO, as it has some references already, and can have a clear real-world reference (the UNATCO website which was removed because it looked too real after 9/11). Didn't find it right now, but it was somewhere amond DX articles. It still needs some more external refs, but I've unfortunately lost the touch with DX community in last couple years. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 03:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 00:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 10:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Military History elections
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 13:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007
Delivered by grafikbot 17:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 16:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:GuntherHermann.jpg
Hello, CP\M. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:GuntherHermann.jpg) was found at the following location: User:CP\M/UNATCO. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:PaulDenton.jpg
Hello CP\M, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:PaulDenton.jpg) was found at the following location: User:CP\M/UNATCO. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:UNATCOTrooper.jpg
Hello CP\M, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:UNATCOTrooper.jpg) was found at the following location: User:CP\M/UNATCO. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Morrowind FA push
Thanks for your help with the Morrowind article, and your substantial help with the Black Marsh article in the past. I'm just about to enter the article for FAC. Wish me luck! Geuiwogbil 22:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

CP/M
I got a kick out of your user page... "This user contributes using CP/M." Is that even possible? I still pull out my old Kaypro 2X from time to time to play games. Man, trying to hook up that old 300 baud modem to the internet would be a hoot. --Lendorien 22:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, it's not practical, of course... But CP/M-86, with drivers et cetera, isn't all that obsolete. I've got a laptop running it, which I have to use to work with some quite modern industrial equipment. It doesn't age in 10 years like computers, and sometimes you only have the programs for old good CP/M. It's superior to DOS in some aspects, and Lynx isn't too unfamiliar to people used to *nix. Of course, actually I mostly use a modern system to edit, but it's not like CP/M should be lost in ages. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 09:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * One of CP/M's main strengths, and a great attraction, is that it lies near the level of complexity where both the hardware and software can be fully mastered by a single human. If necessary, one might build a CP/M-like OS and hardware to run it in one's garage from scratch within a reasonable timeframe -- similar to World War I era aircraft or some other great projects of invention.  MS-DOS is too closed for that, and Linux' complexity is far too great for any single person to wholly comprehend. Digwuren 19:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 16:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Userbox
I have shamelessly stolen your userbox, resized it to standard proportions, and converted it into this template. Digwuren 19:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator selection
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 02:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Kirill 00:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)
Delivered by grafikbot 15:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

hhey
it has been way too long shadin —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 18:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi! Yeah, sure. I have less time for editing lately, but greetz nonetheless. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 01:08, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * sounds like you've been busy Shadin2 16:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)
Delivered by grafikbot 13:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)
Delivered by grafikbot 15:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls). Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Mages' Guild
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mages' Guild, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of Mages' Guild. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls)
Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lorkhan (Elder Scrolls)
Lorkhan (Elder Scrolls), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Lorkhan (Elder Scrolls) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Lorkhan (Elder Scrolls) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Lorkhan (Elder Scrolls) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fighters' Guild
Fighters' Guild, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Fighters' Guild satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Fighters' Guild and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Fighters' Guild during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mages' Guild
Mages' Guild, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Mages' Guild satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Mages' Guild and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Mages' Guild during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Mk 48 Torpedo
While the data about the real speed and range of the Mk 48 are not official, I think that a Jane's estimate is more than enough a citation to include them in the article. So, I will do that, if you are not against it. KostasG (talk) 15:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I wrote a couple of more things with a reference. I don't particularly like the site where I found the data, but I couldn't find the official USN thing. If you can spare a few moments take a look @ the article and tell me your opinion. Thanks a lot :) KostasG (talk) 01:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28! --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 12:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:21, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)