User talk:CPAT

January 2016
Hello, I'm SideshowBob7. I noticed that you made a change to an article, All Nippon Airways, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SideshowBob7 (talk) 10:26, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sudan Airways Flight 139, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 12:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to AirAsia Japan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 13:10, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Swiss Global Airlines, without any reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.-- The  aviation   user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 22:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 2016 Bandara Brussels Bom


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2016 Bandara Brussels Bom. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2016_Brussels_bombings. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2016_Brussels_bombings – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 19:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Faith (dog), appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Fylbecatulous talk 15:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Qatar Airways. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 13:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or add other non-existent materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Qantas, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ZJOEY (talk) 13:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at China Southern Airlines, you may be blocked from editing without any further warning. ZJOEY (talk) 14:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I've removed the nonsense that you left at Cathay Pacific fleet and you have make many unsourced material to Wikipedia a lot. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, I will honestly report this to an administrator. Take this as your very last warning. ZJOEY (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Emirates fleet. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 16:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  18:21, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Turkish Airlines, you may be blocked from editing without any further warning. ZJOEY (talk) 03:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lufthansa. Take this as your very last warning. ArdajaniB (talk) 04:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I have reported you at WP:AIV following your unsourced changes to Etihad Airways. ZJOEY (talk) 13:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Katietalk 13:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

I am not a Sockpuppet
--UTRSBot (talk) 15:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * To the reviewing admin, please note further attempts to be unblocked at socks User talk:GJZHA and User talk:CZXCA. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I strongly suggest revoking talk page access, given the history here. The user is clearly just deliberately wasting our time. --Yamla (talk) 13:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC)