User talk:CPGLCONGO

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amini Cishugi (January 2)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Amini_Cishugi Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Nothing's changed.

 SITH   (talk)   14:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cor Akim (January 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cor Akim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cor Akim, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cor_Akim Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cor_Akim reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Amini Cishugi) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Amini Cishugi.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 23:09, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Marcel Utembi Tapa


Hello, CPGLCONGO. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marcel Utembi Tapa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:33, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Amini Cishugi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amini Cishugi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amini Cishugi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 13:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Rue Patrice Émery Lumumba moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rue Patrice Émery Lumumba, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Streets in Bukavu


A tag has been placed on Category:Streets in Bukavu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 01:51, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Transport in Bukavu


A tag has been placed on Category:Transport in Bukavu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Amini Cishugi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amini Cishugi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amini Cishugi& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 20:10, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Amini Cishugi
Template:Amini Cishugi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Praxidicae (talk) 20:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Rue Patrice Émery Lumumba concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rue Patrice Émery Lumumba, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rue Patrice Émery Lumumba


Hello, CPGLCONGO. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rue Patrice Émery Lumumba".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 14:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Actualite.cd


A tag has been placed on Actualite.cd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 18:58, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Overlinking
Please note: diff Tony (talk)  02:31, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Pascal Mulegwa moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Pascal Mulegwa, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 21:14, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pascal Mulegwa


Hello, CPGLCONGO. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pascal Mulegwa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amini Cishugi


A tag has been placed on Amini Cishugi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amini Cishugi (2nd nomination). (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 17:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bujumbura Light University alumni


A tag has been placed on Category:Bujumbura Light University alumni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People associated with Bujumbura Light University


A tag has been placed on Category:People associated with Bujumbura Light University requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Steve Wembi
Hello, CPGLCONGO,

Thank you for creating Steve Wembi.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Articles written by Steve Wembi do not meet notability guidelines for biography of living persons. This page has to meet the requirements of WP:ANYBIO."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 06:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Media in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Template:Media in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Strong2kin Moov


A tag has been placed on Strong2kin Moov, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 11:38, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello !
 * I hope you're doing well. I've reacted by contesting the speedy delete nomination, but a few minutes later the page was deleted by Jimfbleak . I did not quite understand the reasons why the page was deleted. By the way, I know that this page was the subject of a debate on Wikipedia in French very recently. But I believe that it is not the cause which has just influenced this action.
 * I referenced all the paragraphs written (everything is on the internet via these links used in reference) by reliable press articles from major media and dating back a few years. So, I do not really know. If possible, I would like some clarification or perhaps some remarks or advice. Also, I would like the page restored to draft. Sincerely CPGLCONGO (talk) 13:14, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Reply
Thanks for message. I note that you referred to the founder as "Jérémie", which suggests that you may have a conflict of interest. If so, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:CPGLCONGO. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   </tt>. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
 * Although you gave references, they included the company itself, interviews with its founder and press releases, which are not independent third-party sources.


 * There is nothing in what you wrote to suggest that this website is notable. It appears to have no staff or identifiable income stream, and appears to be just another website.


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.


 * Apart from calling the CEO by his first name, we get claims or opinions presented as if they were real facts, eg Jérémie revealed in an interview with Actualite.cd in 2019, the media attracted more attention from young people is a claim sourced to its CEO . And becomes a benchmark for Congolese music news, with several thousand new subscribers monthly is promo sourced to the company.


 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. You must also reply to the COI request above. <b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b> - talk to me?  15:06, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you too for your feedback.
 * For this passage, it's exactly the same way that I found it. Reason why I mentioned the Actualite.cd on which the article is published.
 * On the fourth paragraph of this article here (published on 23 January 2019) you can read this: « Je n’avais pas un bureau. Je courais derrière un ami graphiste qui avait un bureau. Je passais plus de quatre fois par semaine dans ses locaux pour profiter du confort et les dompter pour la conception des visuels », raconte Jérémie Kabamba, CEO de Strong2Kin Moov.
 * And the translation is: “I didn't have an office. I was running after a graphic designer friend who had an office. I spent more than four times a week in its premises to enjoy the comfort and tame them for the design of the visuals”, says Jérémie Kabamba, CEO of Strong2Kin Moov.
 * And then again, even on the company's website and other medias (e.g., 1, 2, 3), they say that it is gaining hundreds of thousands of subscribers and becoming the reference of Congolese music news. I didn't (personally) write that, because I find it a bit exaggerated. Hundreds of thousands is really a lot, even if their profiles on several social medias have several tens of thousands of subscribers (or followers depending on), even hundreds of thousands.
 * Then, I just said thousands on Wikipedia. The rest should be part of an analysis after a few months, just to reassure that it is tens of thousands monthly, as they say. So, there are a lot of articles about this company in 2022. But it's still really recent. I preferred to use past articles and some from this year.
 * Sincerely CPGLCONGO (talk) 17:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello !
 * I would like to have the copy in draft of the text of the page Strong2kin Moov to continue editing it. ℂℙ𝔾𝕃ℂ𝕆ℕ𝔾𝕆 (乚モイ 州モ に几ロ山 什モ尺モ) 13:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Strong2kin Moov for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strong2kin Moov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Strong2kin Moov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. A loose necktie (talk) 09:37, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, CPGLCONGO

Thank you for creating Strong2kin Moov.

User:Hey man im josh, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hey man im josh (talk) 15:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hope you are doing well. As you can read here the previous discussion following the first deletion of this page, I really read the various comments given to improve the page content. And I even gave several sources used to find all the written information. But I have not yet understood why the page is proposed for deletion? I thought I had improved it, but (unfortunately) that is not the case. I would like to know the reasons, it will help me for my future contributions on the whole encyclopedia. Thank you. ℂℙ𝔾𝕃ℂ𝕆ℕ𝔾𝕆 (乚モイ 州モ に几ロ山 什モ尺モ) 19:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey, I'm sorry about that talk page message. It had to do with me marking your page as reviewed as part of the new page patrol process. Unfortunately I misunderstood an aspect of it, and removed my message on the talk page and marked the page as unreviewed. Please just ignore my previous message on your talk page! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anzor Alem (August 17)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anzor Alem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Anzor_Alem Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Anzor_Alem reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Anzor Alem has a new comment
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;"> I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anzor Alem. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:38, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)