User talk:CPO Pieman

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see
 * Wikipedia's policies on vandalism
 * Policies on banned or discouraged content

If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Toddst1 (talk) 23:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest

February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Toddst1 (talk) 23:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Metric units
Please do not remove metric units from articles.--Curtis Clark (talk) 04:51, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:UNITS, a section within WP:MOS: "In scientific articles, use the units employed in the current scientific literature on that topic. This will usually be SI". Changing to US units of measure violates Wikipedia guidelines for scientific articles, as does switching the sequence so US measures come first: "Wikipedia generally prefers international systems of measurement, such as the SI, over U.S. customary units or the imperial system. Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, write "He was 1.83 meters (6 foot) tall", not the reverse." Please do not continue making edits of this "reverse" sort. Dyanega (talk) 00:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Please stop changing international units of measure to US units of measure. It is NOT appropriate to do so in an international resource such as Wikipedia. Dyanega (talk) 23:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

You have now been asked three times, politely, to refrain from making such changes. If you persist, the matter will be directed to an administrator. Dyanega (talk) 23:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Please note that you are also in violation of Wikipedia's "Three-revert" rule. DO NOT CONTINUE TO REVERT PAGES. Please leave Yellowjacket and Hornet alone; if you continue, it WILL be reported. Dyanega (talk) 23:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Sleepaholic (talk) 04:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Sleepaholic (talk) 04:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Halo Fanfiction
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Halo Fanfiction, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Erechtheus (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Halo Fanfiction
An article that you have been involved in editing, Halo Fanfiction, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Halo Fanfiction. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Erechtheus (talk) 00:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Old Moonraker (talk) 20:28, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Closedmouth (talk) 02:45, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

No personal attacks, please
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bob talk 17:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Labrador Retriever
Hi, I understand that sometimes it becomes quite tedious to keep our cool, but can you two have some kind of working arrangement in the article without having to revert each other? That would be beneficial for the article as a whole. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 18:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * "I hate British English" is not a valid reason for reverting an article. If you continue this behaviour, you may find yourself blocked from editing. My advice would be to sort it out rationally in the talk page of the article. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 19:18, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Your constant vandalism
I have reported your constant vandalism to the Labrador Retriever page. It should be dealt with in the next day or so, hopefully. -- Plasma Twa  2  19:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tan     39  19:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

Chris Hansen
I actually AM an admin, but that's not relevant to the issue at hand; when I edit articles, I'm just a user, just like you. I reverted, you posted to talk, I responded, you didn't respond back. The onus is on you to justify its inclusion, not for me to justify excluding it. hbdragon88 (talk) 21:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I've just seen this discussion now. You don't seem to understand sources CPO, I suggest you read WP:V and maybe WP:RS (though RS is an essay, not a guideline). Photobucket is most certainly not a reliable source. Thanks! Fin©™ 15:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Call of Duty: World at War
Hello there. Please stop changing the order of platforms. It's alphabetical and Xbox 360 is after Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 3 and Wii alphabetically, therefore it goes last. Thanks! Fin©™ 15:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Please stop changing the order of platforms on video game articles, including Call of Duty: World at War and Spider-Man 3 (video game). They are meant to be in alphabetical order, not in the order that you prefer. If you keep changing the platform order, you could violate WP:3RR and be blocked for your edits. Thank you. -- Comandante    { Talk }  19:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)