User talk:CR4ZE/Archive 1

Orphaned non-free image File:Red Faction Armageddon logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Red Faction Armageddon logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:56, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Skyrim
I'm a bit overloaded at the moment .. Could take 2 days before I get chance. I'll try to hurry up. I haven't even read the gameinformer article yet.. I'll do it though if no-one else fixes it first.Sf5xeplus (talk) 03:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Gameplay section of Skyrim page
Recently you reverted an edit I made because it wasn't worded as well as the previous edit (under the gameplay section of the Skyrim article on Radiant AI and Radiant Story). I have no problems with that, except the previous edit has incorrect information and I was trying to fix that. I was wondering if you could instead try to word it better, rather than reverting it to wrong information? I made a discussion topic on the page, but you didn't seem to notice so I'm contacting you here. Thanks. 184.94.122.243 (talk) 04:39, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Could I also note that your recent big overhaul of the section removed some information which is extremely relevant to the article such as the fact that there are five major towns and that the class system had been used in Oblivion - trying to undo this was much slower because of the size of your edit. Thanks for the tidy up though. Reichsfürst (talk) 08:30, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Saints Row logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Saints Row logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:28, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Theft Auto V, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks! CR4ZE (talk) 09:28, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

GTAIV review
Hi Craze, I just randomly noticed you reviewed that article. Just a heads up that general practice is that you allow the nominator 7 days (at least) to update the article per your review, unless passing is improbable or impossible. Im only stating this because it has been failed despite being "close". -- Nbound (talk) 09:36, 31 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I said the article was close to encourage the article's editors to pursue another GAN. However, as I've outlined in my 2500-word review, there are too many problems with inconsistent sourcing, the gameplay section verging on a game guide, and lots of choppy paragraphs that the problems with the article are deeply rooted and some parts need to be rewritten. Rather than pressure the editors to get this done on a time limit, I've given them a lot of worthy feedback and encouraged them to renominate the article in the future. CR4ZE (talk) 09:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

GTAV GAN
I appreciate your concern and I will leave that up to the reviewer thank you very much. Boaxy (talk) 10:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Correct I haven't contributed much to the article. Doesn't mean I cannot nominate the article. Boaxy (talk) 07:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

GTAV torture
Can you please check out what I wrote on the GTA V talk page? In the controversy section of the article it is stated that Trevor advocates torture for information gathering by quoting something out of context but if you click on the source and read the short conversation he clearly states its useless for gathering information. I'm not too good at wiki editing but its inaccurate and locked Revswim (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Theft Auto V, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)