User talk:CR4ZE/Archive 2

GTA V
I have re-rated GTA V to a B. It's quite good, and should have few problems at GAN and really doesn't need much work for FAC (although I recommend a peer review and an A-class nomination, of course). Good job! — Mr. V (t – c)   06:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've put a lot of work into the article so it's good to know an outside reviewer is pleased with it. Will check over the article for any problems, and then push a GAN. CR 4 ZE (t) 01:49, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, pleaseconsult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:43, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grand Theft Auto V
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grand Theft Auto V you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- 04:41, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Re: Skyrim
I've got some waiting GA reviews I've got to hit up first but I hope to have you comments by the end of this weekend. Cheers. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 15:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reminder (I'm a forgetful one and need to be prodded often :) Look for comments tomorrow. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 19:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Moving your talk page archive
You probably want your talk page archive moved from: User talk:CR4ZE/Archive1" to User talk:CR4ZE/Archive 1" Note space between "Archive 1". That is the name format that ClueBot III will use based on your current config. Makyen (talk) 20:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The main reason to do this would be that other tools which you may use in the future may not find that archive page because of relying on the space being there. ClueBot III will have no problem with it.Makyen (talk) 01:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for the tip. CR 4 ZE (t) 02:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

GTA V
I would request you to be patient.I have read all the sections day by day.I find no mistakes in these so I am not posting any comments.It is not that I am not reviewing the article. Attentively, RRD13 (talk) 08:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grand Theft Auto V
The article Grand Theft Auto V you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grand Theft Auto V for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- 08:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DarthBotto -- 01:31, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

re: Saints Row article
Hey, you have a reply at my talk page, for when you have a moment  czar  ♔  15:42, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
The article The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DarthBotto -- 04:51, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * My pleasure! The article's looking good as it is, which is why my review has been so brief. I just want to ensure it's in ship shape! D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 21:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
The article The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DarthBotto -- 23:52, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Holy crap, that's awesome!  S ven M anguard   Wha?  00:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Death of Lisa Harnum


The article Death of Lisa Harnum has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTMEMORIAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 11:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Death of Lisa Harnum for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Lisa Harnum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Death of Lisa Harnum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VQuakr (talk) 08:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Death of Lisa Harnum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anorexia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto V
Dear fellow Wikipedian, I saw that you reverted an edit I did to The article Grand Theft Auto V. I linked a word pretty much primary to the article. It is nowhere written that a word can only be linked once in an article. A word can be linked as many times as appropriate. The only main requirement is that the word must not be linked more than once in the same section. And even that is not an absolute rule. It can also be tweaked if the situation calls for it and this has been done in thousands of articles. You removed it saying that the word has already been linked in another, much farther section of the article. This is a very weak reason, even simple words (though not WP:Overlink) can be linked if they are situated so faraway and the word I linked was one that was primary too the article. Furthermore, the sentence required for it to be done. All other games in the sentence were linked, and it looked inappropriate for only one last word to not be linked. It did not appear good and looked out of place. So i have reverted your revert. Hope you are still happy.

King Of The Wise (talk) 10:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

By your logic, then, "Grand Theft Auto IV" should have been wikilinked in its first use in the paragraph, in the sentence about the GameRankings score. You didn't do that, because you felt that you should wikilink later on just because there was a list of other games that were linked which made it look inappropriate without a link. Therefore you must have also thought that for some reason it's fine to have "It is also currently the fifth-highest rated game on Metacritic, tying with multiple other games, and behind only" not linked, but not fine if it's "Grand Theft Auto IV". That is an even weaker reason. We are not creating an avant-garde piece so we don't need splashes of blue in the text just because. I've seen redundant wikilinking brought up in GANs and FACs all the time. We only need to link when there is relevant contextual information provided in the article that has been linked to. "Grand Theft Auto IV" is linked once in Gameplay in a sentence which compares the game's additional vehicle types, but not again because we assume that the reader reads the article sequentially from start to finish and is familiarised with wikilinked terms as we introduce them. CR 4 ZE (t) 10:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

GTA V
Regarding the revert, both the WP:OVERLINK issues as well as changes to link, e.g. changing melee to melee , are done by Reflinks. Best, Sam Sailor Sing 14:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

@Sam Sailor; So having the link as melee is okay, and your change was just a Reflinks default? And the same for linking publishers in Template:Cite web? In regards to citing publishers in the template, User:Rhain1999 and I agreed that either every publisher is linked every time in the (publisher=) field or that they are linked in the first instance and never again after that. Rhain went with the former. Is that okay? (We have the article at FAC so small things such as this matter). CR 4 ZE (t) 14:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * As for overlinking, if two of those IGN sources are a mile apart in the reflist it seems logical that they are both linked. If there are, say, 50 of them, maybe not. However, if you guys found it appropriate, I'm the last person to waste time on it. But Reflink seems to think differently. Yes, it's the default apparently, no action on my part there. As for the links to redirects, the choices Reflink makes is without question also IMO less valuable than links directly to sub sections. In other words: I understand your motivation for reverting. Best, Sam Sailor Sing 14:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Regarding redirects, well, it's maybe a situation where Reflink's choice makes sense in some cases, but not in other cases. Have a read of User talk:Dispenser/Reflinks. Best, Sam Sailor Sing 15:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * In the instances of sub-section wikilinking in Grand Theft Auto V, they make the most sense as they are. If "melee phase" or "continue point" ever split off into their own article, that would require going through 'What links here' to fix the redundant links from other pages, but there is I'm sure a streamlined way of doing so should that ever happen. CR 4 ZE (t) 04:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Threes!
Thanks again for the thorough review. I appreciate your diligence. (And that Yeezus thread was really interesting... but let's promise not to do that.) See you around czar  ♔  01:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Also if you have any extra FAC advice for the article, let me know (I'll watch this page) czar  ♔  02:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The debate over Yeezus to me brings up the need to have a wider discussion at a WikiProject (WP:ALBUM/ WP:VG), resulting in the insertion of a new guideline into the project's MoS. In regards to Threes! being sent to FAC, I think the mid-sentence footnotes would come up in addition to the "universal acclaim" use. The prose would need meticulous tightening. Take the following sentence as an example: "The game had no inclination towards minimalism and the pair felt that they needed game mechanics to make the game appear more difficult and worthy of player attention". A mouthful. There's three uses each of the words "the" and "game", which would make the sentence's prose a little unwieldy to read. Consider things like that, and as it's quite a short article, keep reading it aloud to reword sentences to be as succinct as possible.


 * Feel free, if you're interested, to move along my GAN for GTA V development or GTA V's FAC. Don't forget we have work to do on Saints Row, but like you I'm not rushing to work on that one. CR 4 ZE (t) 04:34, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Development of Grand Theft Auto V
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Development of Grand Theft Auto V you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- 22:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Development of Grand Theft Auto V
The article Development of Grand Theft Auto V you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Development of Grand Theft Auto V for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- 02:11, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Development of Grand Theft Auto V
The article Development of Grand Theft Auto V you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Development of Grand Theft Auto V for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- 04:51, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Development of Grand Theft Auto V
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Also, congratulations on the DYK for the Development article! -- Rhain1999  (talk to me) 06:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Music of Grand Theft Auto V
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Music of Grand Theft Auto V you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 19:21, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I also left some input in the FA discussion for GTA V itself. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

A pie for you!
Not a problem. The article is fantastic, especially for a game only a month old. Great work. CR 4 ZE (t &bull; c) 10:26, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Music of Grand Theft Auto V
The article The Music of Grand Theft Auto V you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Music of Grand Theft Auto V for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 15:11, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for The Music of Grand Theft Auto V
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

GTAV congrats
Hey CR4ZE—wanted to congratulate you on the FA. It takes a certain kind of dedication to bring such a broad and high-level topic to FA, especially with such fantastic results. Job well done. See you around czar ♔ 20:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)


 * It would've have been possible without your extensive copy-editing, so thank you for that. I'll get around to posting some recognition on your talk page later on today. Thanks again. CR 4 ZE (t &bull; c) 00:11, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks! Feels so good to get my first featured article. CR 4 ZE (t &bull; c) 00:12, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

FA congratulations
Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of Grand Theft Auto V to FA status recently. If you would like to see this (or any other FA) appear as "Today's featured article" soon, please nominate it at the requests page; if you'd like to see an FA on a particular date in the next year or so, please add it to the "pending" list. In the absence of a request, the article may end up being picked at any time (although with 1,301 articles in Category:Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page at present, there's no telling how long – or short! – the wait might be). You (and your talk-page stalkers) may also be interested to hear that there have been some changes at the TFA requests page recently. Nominators no longer need to calculate how many "points" an article has, the instructions have been simplified, and there's a new nomination system using templates based on those used for DYK suggestions. Please consider nominating another article, or commenting on an existing nomination, and leaving some feedback on your experience. If you'd got any TFA-related questions or problems, please let me know. BencherliteTalk 09:09, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Amazing Spider-Man universe
Hello, I created a user talk page, User_talk:Longshot45/The Amazing Spider-Man universe. If you get a chance check it out then we can make it into an official wiki page. Thanks - Longshot45 (talk) May 8, 2014 5:08

Additional content of GTAV
CR4ZE you do know that all updates in GTA Online are also present in the single-player mode. Why did you remove the section then. Additional content warrants it's own section. It doesn't belong under the "Multiplayer launch" section. KahnJohn27 (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

GTA Online PS3 aggregate scores at GameRankings
On GameRankings the aggregate score is based on only 1 review of the GTA Online. I think it should be removed. It isn't a real aggregate. KahnJohn27 (talk) 08:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Arkham Knight for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arkham Knight is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Arkham Knight until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Game Informer
Thanks! Is there an official title and author byline on the article, or is it just credited to the magazine? czar ♔ 15:47, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah yes. I had the cover saved in another folder for some reason (it's been three years since I've looked at this). I can send through the cover page if you want, although it's just a big screenshot with a short blurb. Title is "EMBRACING THE CRAZY" and words are by Dan Ryckert. Starts on pg 48. CR 4 ZE (t &bull; c) 15:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=610584497 your edit] to Infamous Second Son may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:24, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * |first=Michael |date=February 12, 2014 |work=Polygon |publisher=Vox Media |accessdate=May 29, 2014}}

DYK nomination of Halo 5: Guardians
Hello! Your submission of Halo 5: Guardians at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! czar ♔ 01:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Infamous Second Son, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sleeping Dogs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Help
Thanks for the review. I wasn't responsible for a lot in the article, mostly just the front section and images. But no one ever responded to me when I asked them for feedback, so thanks you for that! Also, do you have any tips for writing better and making it focused? URDNEXT (talk) 17:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I hope that the major contributors were notified, but otherwise you should have really gone through head-to-tail to make sure everything was up to scratch. You didn't need to close the peer review so soon—in fact a bot closes it down automatically after about a month anyway. What's hard for me to give feedback on is the prose, because there are expectations that I would have that are more in line with FA-quality, which wouldn't necessarily be required for GA. I'd expect the prose to flow a little cleaner than it's doing now. I gave you that optional example in the GA review to steer you where I'm thinking; it truly helps if you read the article aloud. If you find your mouth getting caught around sentences you know they're a problem. Try George Orwell's effective writing principles. Always drop a word from a sentence if it's possible, and use simple language wherever possible ("use" can almost always replace "utilise"). Echoing what I said in the review, you need much more, high-quality sourcing throughout even for GA standard. Basically anything not listed at WP:VG/RS should be taken out (unless you want to put a case up for an individual source at the talk page), and anything that can't be covered by RS's should go. Development left me wanting to know more about how the game was designed, rather than its publisher problems. That information should be kept in, but it only took Google searching for me to find developer interviews and the like that give some good info about the game's design. That to me is a scope (3a) issue. I don't think there's enough research into the critical reviews either. If you wanted to (and I'm not saying the Reception sections I've written are the optimus cognito), take a look at the stuff I've done on Skyrim, GTA V and Second Son, because that's the kind of analysis and length that I think is solid. You can certainly have a shorter Reception section but you need to make sure you get the main points covered by a decent pool of reviews. CR 4 ZE (t &bull; c) 15:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

GA
First of all, things like formatting of references have nothing to do with GA process. Second, both "CVG" and "ComputerAndVideoGames.com" is actually very correct - these are the official names of this website, plus "ComputerAndVideoGames" without ".com" (go and check).

For what and how should be actually reviewed, see Reviewing good articles ("Perfectly formatted citations are not required." but also other things, read it all with comrehension). --TRIGGERWARNING (talk) 23:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Contrary to a (very) popular meme, there's also nothing wrong with using social networking accounts (as long as it's not just random people of course). --TRIGGERWARNING (talk) 23:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Cheers for your concern, but I never asked for, and don't require, your help with reviewing Good Article Nominations. As already noted on the review page, the concerns I had with the article go far and beyond the issues you seem to have a problem with me pointing out. If you subtract my out-of-scope comments, that still leaves organisation, sourcing and scope problems large enough to merit the fail. If you have a problem with the review, take it to the WP:GAR, but in the meantime, my verdict on the article has been finalised. CR 4 ZE (t &bull; c) 00:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Niemti/- per your topic ban, you are not allowed to participate in the GA process, and per Topic ban, that includes talking about GANs. Drop it or get blocked. -- Pres N  03:15, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Apologies —I didn't realise that this way Niemti. I otherwise wouldn't have responded to the comment. CR 4 ZE (t &bull; c) 05:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Halo 5: Guardians
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

What's jawp?
At the Featured Article Review for Drakengard just now, you mentioned something called "jawp". What is it? All I'm getting when I search for it is a lot of weird results. --ProtoDrake (talk) 16:43, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It's an abbreviation for Japanese Wikipedia. CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c) 17:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

FAC
Snuggums (talk • contributions) 07:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Copy editing
I know that you're busy with the GTA V FAC, but when are you gonna be available for copy-editing? Sleepng Dogs is just like you said, "in dire need of copy-editing". Specially that new information was added. Contact me when available! URDNEXT (talk) 15:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614061628 your edit] to Infamous Second Son may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:12, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * in Limited and Collector's editions |date=October 17, 2013 |last=Sarkar |first=Samit |work= Polygon (website)|Polygon |publisher=Vox Media |accessdate=June 23, 2014}} All pre-

Grand Theft Auto V
Hey, man! Do you have any information or sources that give information on how Rockstar designed Michael? I'm working on a draft, but I can't seem to find anything. Any help would be appreciated, thanks! URDNEXT (talk) 20:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


 * No, not really, at least not to the same extent as Trevor Philips. It's for that reason that I don't think a page for Michael would meet notability in the same way that Trevor does. Trevor can be singled out because his reception was much more polarising, especially with the torture controversy—that, and Ogg happened to give a lot more interviews than Luke and Fonteno on his character's development. I'd advise that you work at the list article first, and if you can get enough on Michael, propose a split. and I would eventually like to bring that article to FL, so I'd encourage you to work away at it. I'll be looking at Sleeping Dogs (video game) at some point in the near future.  CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c) 07:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * CR 4 ZE Alright, so can I join you guys on the list thing? I can be really helpful. URDNEXT (talk) 12:25, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Of course. That's the spirit of Wikipedia. CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c) 13:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I mean lie, in a team way... Like the avengers. I know it sounds like exagerating, but if we could plan our moves and communicate with each other while editing, we could be a hell lot more productive. Think about it. Let's say we take on Gta 5 characters. Then we assign each other to certain sections of the article (as long as its confortable). What do you think? URDNEXT (talk) 14:01, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Infamous Second Son
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Infamous Second Son you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 119.160.119.125 -- 119.160.119.125 (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Major contributor :)
Hi CR4ZE,

I haven't been very active on Wikipedia lately, trying to focus on my studies. I wanted to let you know that I appreciate that you noticed my work on The Last of Us, mentioning me in the GAN discussion. It's not the reason why I edit Wikipedia, but it's always nice to know someone notices your hard work. Hopefully I'll be back editing sooner than later. Kind regards, --Soetermans. T / C 10:51, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

FA
Hey man, I'm working on the Super Mario Bros. 3's page and I was wondering what you think of it, considering I'm planning on taking it to FA. Cheers! URDNEXT (talk) 16:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Videoball review
Racking up the requests, I see. If you have a moment, I'd appreciate a short note or review at the Videoball peer review about the article's current state given the available sources (this is to say that it cannot meet the GA criteria for being unreleased, but it can still be included within an Action Button Entertainment good topic because the article is in good condition where it isn't eligible for GA itself—the good topic criteria asks for a peer review). I thought it'd be fast for you since you've already reviewed the article. czar ♔   15:55, 22 June 2014 (UTC) P.S. I'll be sure to leave some FAC comments for you soon—don't have enough time to function as it is
 * ; ♔  Did you see the Hundreds review I just did? You have 4 days to fix it otherwise it will be a fail URDNEXT (talk) 16:02, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I did, and I thought I had replied, but I hadn't—thanks for the note. We can continue there czar ♔   16:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Nothing freaks me out like a >20 kB article, but if it's still there when I'm done with work in two weeks, I'll take it czar ♔   04:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Quick question
WP:VG's Newsletter department is looking for editors to interview for our upcoming Featured Editor column, and your name has come up in discussions during the last several quarters as a likely candidate. The interview consists of some 15 questions that you can answer however you like and which you can tinker with up until the newsletter is published. You can review previous interview questions here to get a sense of the kinds of questions you would be asked. If you would be willing to answer some questions, please let me know at my talk page. -Thibbs (talk) 13:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Lost track of time today and I have to get to sleep now. You can start in on some questions here for now. I'll fill it in a bit more tomorrow. The newsletter is due on Wednesday so hopefully we can get it done by then, but no big deal if it's a day or two late too. -Thibbs (talk) 02:32, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2014
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Infamous Second Son, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beanie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Infamous Second Son
The article Infamous Second Son you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Infamous Second Son for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Czar -- Czar (talk) 19:01, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Infamous Second Son
The article Infamous Second Son you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Infamous Second Son for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. czar ♔   15:38, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK
SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 15:01, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

TFA requests
Re Grand Theft Auto V, which you (or someone else) listed at WP:TFARP as a possible TFA for 17th September – just to let you know that suggestions can now be made at the TFA requests page for September, so feel free to nominate the article. Thanks, BencherliteTalk 10:27, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Infamous Second Son
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Sleeping Dogs
Hey, CRAZE, how's it going! I was wondering if you could help me with Sleeping Dogs (video game) since I really need help with it. Ever since I joined Wiki I have been trying to tackle the article alone but I can't seem to do it by myself wit the amount of experience I have. Is there any way you could help me take it to GA? I know you usually only edit Military related articles, but this one is rated B class so it should be an easy thing for both of us. What do you think? Thanks for everything in advance, URDNEXT (talk) 12:36, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Development of Grand Theft Auto V
Congrats on getting this to FA!  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 03:40, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

AC: And Then There Were None
Hi. I began the copy edit on this article, but began to run into issues that went far beyond c/e. So I went to the FAR discussion... don't you think it might be better to wait until the issues brought up in FAR are addressed, prior to submitting it for c/e? Onel5969 (talk) 22:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I made the request for a copy-edit because I figured that would be one step towards preventing the article from being delisted. I agree that the issues are deeply-rooted and thought a c/e would help. CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c) 08:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi CR4ZE. I'm quite busy these days and I don't think I will be able to improve the article or even give it a review. Wuzh (talk) 12:16, 28 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay, finished the c/e... also made an attempt to address some of the issues in the FAR. Hope it helps. Onel5969 (talk) 04:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

FA congratulations
Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of Development of Grand Theft Auto V to FA status recently. I know you know all about WP:TFAR (specific and non-specific date slots) and the "pending" list, so this is just a reminder to use them as and when suits you. Many thanks. BencherliteTalk 14:13, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Grand Theft Auto V
Just saw this become FL. Keep it up with everything you do that is GTA V :D!  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 23:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Good effort at promoting this as well as the other GTAV related content. It's listed in the latest draft Signpost, feel free to edit in a description for it. Signpost. Cowlibob (talk) 18:28, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

WP:FOUR for Development of Grand Theft Auto V

 * My apologies, I just noticed that you nominated this for DYK at 04:58, 30 March 2014 after it was promoted to GA at 04:46, 30 March 2014. GA promotions are not eligible for FOUR.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:56, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * My fault when I should've taken it straight to DYK after creating the page instead of waiting for the GA. Oh well, life goes on. CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c) 12:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Sleeping Dogs FAC
I put up the article for FAC alongside Tezero and Czar just now. (Featured article candidates/Sleeping Dogs (video game)/archive1) Are you available for providing some feedback/comments at the nom page? Your help is very much appreciated! URDNEXT (talk) 22:39, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm in the process of reviewing and hope to have it to you within the next few days. However, just a heads-up that based on my first reading, I can't give this a support yet without serious work done on the prose issues I'll outline when I get the review to you. CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c) 15:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll into those issues. Thanks! URDNEXT (talk) 15:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Copyedit request
Hello! The other editors and myself are gearing up to put Dota 2 up for Featured Article Candidacy, but first we're making sure everything's in order. Tezero specifically recommended that I contact you about copyediting the article before anything else. Would this be of interest to you? D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 02:10, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I think that was JimmyBlackwing, but yeah, the more the merrier. Tezero (talk) 02:30, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It was? Damn my peripheral organizational skills! D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 05:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, this is awkward...Of course, I'm happy to help out. I'll take a look at it in the future. Any potential FA is a win/win for the project. CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c) 13:56, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! Yes, to have one more set of eyes (yours) on the page before it goes through its (hopefully) final peer review, would be fantastic. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 00:42, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Glad to see that DarthBotto took my advice. I hope it's not too inconvenient, CR4ZE: I recommended you as a copyeditor because of your great writing on Development of GTA V. WPVG doesn't have a lot of really talented copyeditors (like Deckiller or TKD of old) anymore, and the GOCE has always been hit-or-miss; it's hard to find people who can bring an article up to 1a caliber. Thanks for accepting the request. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I have a question about your suggestions on the talk page, CR4ZE. You mention that you would like some elaboration about combat? Could you explain what more you want? I mean, I was using Halo: Combat Evolved as a basis for the rewritten gameplay section, so I hope to keep things pragmatic. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 01:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2014
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa
Had me going there for a minute trying to figure that out. It's the move protection that is on until 2015. Here's the full line with bolding for the current editing, "15:08, 14 October 2014 CambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs | block) changed protection level of Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa [edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 15:08, 21 October 2014 (UTC)) [move=sysop] (expires 15:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)) (Persistent disruptive editing) (hist | change)"

So a week for the editing and a year for the move. Cheers. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 04:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!


Happy Halloween!

Hello CR4ZE: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!   –   Snuggums  ( talk  /  edits ) 21:21, 28 October 2014 (UTC) Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

GTA V
Remember due weight, don't add too much on the latest controversy since we've yet to find out its importance, I think with one pro commentary from Kotaku and one against like IGN it's fine Loganmac (talk) 12:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the concern. Rest assured that I had considered this all in advance—I could've included more commentary from other publications but I knew that would raise an issue of undue WP:WEIGHT. By the same token, we needed to have some discussion from games journalists in order to present an unbiased view. I understand this is a contentious issue already, which makes it difficult to discuss from an objective, encyclopedic standpoint, so I think any editors involved with this article should take it upon themselves to peer review and raise their opinions. Cheers. CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c) 12:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year CR4ZE!


Happy New Year! CR4ZE, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 05:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC) Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2014
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Grand Theft Auto V (re-release)
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:23, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grand Theft Auto V (re-release)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dom497 -- Dom497 (talk) 02:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V
The article Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 12:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grand Theft Auto V (re-release)
The article Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dom497 -- Dom497 (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grand Theft Auto V (re-release)
The article Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dom497 -- Dom497 (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grand Theft Auto V (re-release)
The article Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dom497 -- Dom497 (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V
The article Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2015
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Grand Theft Auto V PS3 PS4 comparison.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Grand Theft Auto V PS3 PS4 comparison.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2015
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Precious
  Grand Theft Auto V

Thank you for quality articles such as Grand Theft Auto V, its development and its accolades, its controversies and music, for reviews and for teamwork, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Grand Theft Auto V PS3 PS4 comparison.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Grand Theft Auto V PS3 PS4 comparison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2015
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2015
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Grand Theft Auto V PS3 PS4 comparison.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Grand Theft Auto V PS3 PS4 comparison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, CR4ZE. I'm just posting to let you know that List of accolades received by Grand Theft Auto V – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 16, 2017. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2017
 The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter

Volume 10, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2017

Previous issue | Index | Next issue 

Project At a Glance As of Q2 2017, the project has:


 * 211 Featured Articles
 * 70 Featured Lists
 * 11 Featured Topics
 * 1 Featured Portals


 * 28 Featured Pictures
 * 1,172 Good Articles
 * 23 Good Topics

Content


 * Changes to Featured and Good content
 * News items and announcements


 * Feature: Shiny Wikipedians - A Featured Content Leaderboard
 * Feature: Final Fantasy VII postmortem

Project Navigation

To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list. (Delivered 14:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC))
 * VG Project Main pages
 * Main project – talk
 * Project category – talk
 * Portal – talk
 * VG Project Departments
 * Assessment – talk
 * Cleanup – talk
 * Peer review – talk
 * Reference library – talk
 * Newsletter – talk
 * Video game images – talk
 * Video game images – talk

Development of Grand Theft Auto V scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Development of Grand Theft Auto V article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 17, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/September 17, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! <b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b> - talk to me?  10:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Precious two years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for today's Development of Grand Theft Auto V saying "The development of Grand Theft Auto V was one of gaming's biggest undertakings"! Coincidence? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Jill Valentine
Hi CR4ZE.
 * This is what the article looked like before I touched it:
 * This is the difference between my first edit and my successful GA nomination passing:
 * Changes in preparation for FAC. This includes implementing changes recommended at peer review:
 * Changes while FAC was open:
 * Changes between FAC being closed and renomination:

Hope this helps. Let me know if you need anything more specific than this. Changed between FAC closing and FAC renomination are not too drastic, however, this is because I had already fixed the majority of concerns raised by both Ealdgyth and SlimVirgin before the nomination was closed (I was working overtime trying to address everything in the hopes it wouldn't be). As I mentioned at the first nomination, SlimVirgin opposed the nomination over several issues that had already been fixed. Her remaining issues included the fact I had assumed good faith and not personally checked offline sources (I now have, it cost me well over $100 I might add, but I can email you scans of every offline source used in the article) a lack of mentioning when costumes appeared (added an entire new paragraph on that) and rewording something she thought was a contradiction (it wasn't). These changes are all view-able in the last diff (I expanded with some of the offline sources once they arrived). If you have any other questions please don't hesitate to ask. Happy to continue talking here if you like. Freikorp (talk) 00:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that mate, that's a big help. Any chance you could still reach me by email re print sources? Cheers. CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c) 01:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Emailed you. :) Freikorp (talk) 01:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I noticed your comments at the FAC. I would suggest, rather than entering a dispute with another reviewer, to focus solely on WP:WIAFA. While a single oppose (if it came, which it hasn't yet) could prevent the article being promoted (if it was a serious issue such as sourcing or copyvio, or a misrepresentation of sources), when it is a matter of interpretation, articles have been promoted over one or more opposes in the past. It is better just to focus on your own review. Despite what another reviewer may think, I have no opinion one way or another on this article; however, I want any article that is promoted to be the best that it can, and to meet the FA criteria. Sarastro1 (talk) 09:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Duly noted. Cheers. CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c) 11:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2017
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Hey, if you're still up to do the review you can start the review by clicking on the revised template. After two months waiting for the original reviewer to even answer the pings, despite him being very much active on Wikipedia, keeping him on seemed like a lost cause. (Should have happened sooner, but I was busy moving.) Cognissonance (talk) 17:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, you have my deepest apologies for not being able to step in to the review after I said I would. I should've just taken over the review after your ping, but I have been extremely busy and inactive on Wikipedia these past few months, so I just didn't have time to conduct the review. In good news at least, the article passed with flying colours. It's a fantastic read, so great work and congrats. If you're planning to take the article along further and are looking for comments at a peer review/ FAC, please feel free to ping me on board and I'll happily give you some thoughts. Cheers! CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c) 10:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC)


 * No hard feelings, man. I hope we'll work together in the future. Cheers :) Cognissonance (talk) 11:10, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

GTA5
Hey, Your edit on Grand Theft Auto V stating "Source does not state that GTA V is the 2nd western game to receive a perfect score. Removing review score not used in prose." - there's now an additional reference confirming this. Regards, Turini2 (talk) 11:13, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change
 * : CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c)

to
 * : CR 4 ZE  (t &bull; c)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 19:07, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 00:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Grand Theft Auto V torture sequence.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Grand Theft Auto V torture sequence.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Jill Valentine
Hi. You commented at Jill Valentine's FAC2, which was a long time ago, so I understand if you don't want to get involved again (or even remember commenting in the first place). But JV's FAC3 was dismissed on the basis that I hadn't contacted previous commentators, so I've gone through all previous FACs and "peer reviews" and tried my best to address any issue which had ever been raised. I'm happy with the article as it is now (in that I believe it meets the featured article criteria), but I'd appreciate any feedback from any previous commentator. Do you think there's something I could improve before renominating? And would you be interested in commenting at FAC4? I'd ideally like to address every issue you may have before renominating, so the FAC can be as uneventful as possible. ;) I'd appreciate any feedback you may have, if you have the time. Cheers. Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Grand Theft Auto V combat.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Grand Theft Auto V combat.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the Non-free fair use tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <b style="color: red">Freshman404</b><b style="color: green">Talk</b> 08:53, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Grand Theft Auto V Los Santos.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Grand Theft Auto V Los Santos.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the Non-free fair use tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <b style="color: red">Freshman404</b><b style="color: green">Talk</b> 08:53, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2019
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:17, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warner Bros. Movie World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page News Corporation ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Warner_Bros._Movie_World check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Warner_Bros._Movie_World?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2020
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:09, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 June 2020
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q2 2020
03:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:46, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Warner Bros. Movie World
The article Warner Bros. Movie World you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Warner Bros. Movie World for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 18:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warner Bros. Movie World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Christmas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 2020
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Four Award nom
Hello CR4Ze, I noticed you withdrew your WP:Four Award nomination of Development of Grand Theft Auto V, stating in the edit summary that it was ineligible because it was promoted to GA before it went through DYK. In fact, Four Award allows this. I've checked the article and it appears that you are Four Award eligible. I'd recommend you re-nominate, unless I'm missing something?  Ergo Sum  14:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I came here to post the same thing. It doesn't matter what order you do things in. On a quick check of the four elements it looks straight forward to me. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:57, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It's in the records list as a current award, not a former one, so I don't think a re-nom is even needed :) &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you all for reaching out and sorry for causing confusion; I was confused as well. I originally received the award from TonyTheTiger when the article passed FAC in August 2014 but it was taken away a few weeks later, with the explanation given that DYKs needed to nominated before GA promotions. I forgot about the awards completely, renominated myself for the article, then remembered I had received it many years ago but thought that the reason it was taken away was sill valid. The eligibility rules must've changed since then and that's what caused the mix-up. I also was never notified otherwise that my award was revalidated and didn't know I was already on the Records page. Anyway, thanks again for following up! —  CR 4 ZE (T &bull; C)  23:46, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Warner Bros. Movie World
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2020
<div style=" background-color: #eeeeee; border-top: 4px #eeeeee solid; border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; text-align: center; padding: 0.5em; margin:0em;"> The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter

Volume 12, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2020

Previous issue | Index | Next issue <div style="border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-bottom: 5px #eeeeee solid; margin:0em;padding:1em; background:#FEFEFE;">

Project At a Glance As of Q4 2020, the project has:


 * 239 Featured Articles
 * 88 Featured Lists
 * 10 Featured Topics


 * 33 Featured Pictures
 * 1,650 Good Articles
 * 28 Good Topics

Content


 * Changes to Featured and Good content
 * News items and announcements
 * WP:VG Talk Page Digest


 * Feature: Don't fake your work
 * Follow-up: VG editing in a time of COVID
 * Interview: TarkusAB

Project Navigation

To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list. (Delivered 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * VG Project Main pages
 * Main project – talk
 * Project category – talk
 * Portal – talk
 * VG Project Departments
 * Assessment – talk
 * Cleanup – talk
 * Peer review – talk
 * Reference library – talk
 * Newsletter – talk
 * Video game images – talk
 * Video game images – talk

A barnstar for you!
Thanks so much for this, ! Idlewild and Soak Zone technically has the honour of being the first, if we're counting small-scale kids' parks in the mix. Nonetheless, I'm delighted to have my work recognised. Thanks again and see you around! —  CR 4 ZE (T &bull; C)  11:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2021
<div style=" background-color: #eeeeee; border-top: 4px #eeeeee solid; border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; text-align: center; padding: 0.5em; margin:0em;"> The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter

Volume 13, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2021

Previous issue | Index | Next issue <div style="border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-bottom: 5px #eeeeee solid; margin:0em;padding:1em; background:#FEFEFE;">

Project At a Glance As of Q1 2021, the project has:


 * 241 Featured Articles
 * 89 Featured Lists
 * 10 Featured Topics


 * 34 Featured Pictures
 * 1,684 Good Articles
 * 31 Good Topics

Content


 * Changes to Featured and Good content
 * News items and announcements
 * WP:VG Talk Page Digest


 * Survey: How does WikiProject Video games determine character notability?
 * Interview: Namcokid47

Project Navigation

To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list. (Delivered 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)) -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * VG Project Main pages
 * Main project – talk
 * Project category – talk
 * Portal – talk
 * VG Project Departments
 * Assessment – talk
 * Cleanup – talk
 * Peer review – talk
 * Reference library – talk
 * Newsletter – talk
 * Video game images – talk
 * Video game images – talk

The Signpost: 25 April 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you today for Warner Bros. Movie World, introduced: "Hollywood on the Gold Coast, with a distinctive Aussie lilt. The only place on Earth where you can blast ray guns at 3D Starros in a Cyborg simulation, drop backwards into stark-black from a Scrappy-Doo huff, and catapult out of the Metropolis tunnels on a Superman punch, all in a single day. Over a near-thirty year tenure since its star-studded 1991 opening, Movie World has grown into one of Australia's premier theme parks and most popular tourist attractions. Those old enough will recall the good ol' days when "experiences" that captured the magic of cinema were sought over high-octane scream machines. Five year old me still revels in awe at the studio backlots along the tram tour, and screams in garish delight as I plummet down the Wild West Falls and zip through the veins of Gotham on Batman Adventure. Throughout the 2000s, the park's status as a thrill-seeker's playground burgeoned. Today, its skyline is dominated by arguably Australia's strongest coaster lineup, including the crown jewel, DC Rivals HyperCoaster. The menacing 60 m near-vertical drop in the backwards-facing final row should be on every enthusiast's bucket list, and one I can't wait to experience again (when us south of the border are allowed across it)."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 2 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you! { —  CR 4 ZE (T &bull; C)  09:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)