User talk:CRAuser

CRAuser, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi CRAuser. In case you haven't noticed, I've answered your questions at the Teahouse. Feel free to respond there if you want more info. --Neil N  talk to me 00:12, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Snapchat has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Snapchat was changed by CRAuser (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860497 on 2017-04-29T20:26:45+00:00.


 * Hi CRAuser! Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that the post above originated from an automated bot that somehow thought that your edit to Snapchat was vandalism. Your edit wasn't. Your edit landed in the false-positives category, and I will report this bug back to its developers. I hope you don't get discouraged from that, as it's strictly automation and nothing personal :) Have a good day! (P.S. If you write a reply to me, please use in the reply, so I get a notification. Thanks!) LocalNet (talk) 07:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Alistair Armand Vigier for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alistair Armand Vigier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alistair Armand Vigier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 00:57, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Erectile dysfunction— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. --  Dane talk  04:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --  Dane talk  04:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

One does not need to source the company website. One can easily verify that the website is live by looking at the website. CRAuser (talk) 04:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello! Please review our verifiability and original research policies.  These are why this edit is being rejected. --  Dane  talk  04:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

I disagree with how you are interpreting that article. Users would be interested to know the website is live again. CRAuser (talk) 04:18, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * This is merely about how the information is being included, not how i'm interpreting it. If you can add the information with a citation, please do so and there won't be an issue. A third party reliable source would be a good place to cite. --  Dane  talk  04:20, 30 March 2018 (UTC)